Suppr超能文献

徒手侧块螺钉固定技术的影像学与临床评估:在颈椎下颈椎节段它总是安全的吗?

Radiographic and clinical assessment of a freehand lateral mass screw fixation technique: is it always safe in subaxial cervical spine?

作者信息

Ra In-Hoo, Min Woo-Kie

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu 700-721, Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu 700-721, Korea.

出版信息

Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):2224-30. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.046. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Many spine surgeons use the freehand technique for lateral mass (LM) screw fixation. However, issues about its safety still exist.

PURPOSE

To examine the safety of the freehand technique after LM screw insertion.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 26 patients (21 men and five women) who underwent LM screw fixation via the freehand technique were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative computed tomography images and medical records were analyzed.

METHODS

During surgery, the lateral trajectory of screws was set using the adjacent spinous process (SP) after the cranial trajectory was set by palpating the joint surface. Computed tomography analyses were performed for the measurement of screw angles, and axial images were evaluated to determine the SP length that would be long enough to not involve the transverse foramen. The medical records were evaluated for the investigation of surgery-related complications.

RESULTS

Each axial and sagittal angle of the screws showed a significant difference. A total of 18 screws (13.5%) involved the transverse foramen, and the mean axial angle of the screws was significantly smaller than the group not involving the foramen (p=.0078). A total of eight screws (6.0%) violated the facet, and the mean sagittal angle was significantly smaller than the group not violating the facet. The average difference in angles between the screw and the actual joint surface was largest at C6 (p=.0472). The mean maximum length of the SP, long enough to not involve the transverse foramen was significantly short at C3 and C6 (p=.0015). The actual SP length in one patient was longer than the maximum SP length determined through analysis in the case of C6. If the SP of C7 was used in C6, the SP length would not be safe in six patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent outcomes were observed with the use of the freehand technique for the insertion of LM screw at the subaxial C spine. However, this technique using the SP may pose a relative risk at C6.

摘要

背景

许多脊柱外科医生采用徒手技术进行侧块螺钉固定。然而,其安全性问题仍然存在。

目的

探讨徒手技术置入侧块螺钉后的安全性。

研究设计

回顾性病例系列研究。

患者样本

共纳入26例行徒手技术侧块螺钉固定的患者(21例男性,5例女性)。

观察指标

分析术后计算机断层扫描图像和病历。

方法

手术中,在通过触诊关节面确定头侧轨迹后,利用相邻棘突来设定螺钉的外侧轨迹。进行计算机断层扫描分析以测量螺钉角度,并评估轴向图像以确定足够长而不涉及横突孔的棘突长度。评估病历以调查手术相关并发症。

结果

螺钉的每个轴向和矢状角均显示出显著差异。共有18枚螺钉(13.5%)涉及横突孔,这些螺钉的平均轴向角显著小于未涉及横突孔的组(p = 0.0078)。共有8枚螺钉(6.0%)侵犯关节面,其平均矢状角显著小于未侵犯关节面的组。螺钉与实际关节面之间的平均角度差异在C6处最大(p = 0.0472)。在C3和C6处,足够长而不涉及横突孔的棘突平均最大长度显著较短(p = 0.0015)。在1例患者中,C6的实际棘突长度长于通过分析确定的最大棘突长度。如果在C6处使用C7的棘突,在6例患者中棘突长度将不安全。

结论

在颈椎下颈椎节段使用徒手技术置入侧块螺钉可获得良好效果。然而,这种使用棘突的技术在C6处可能存在相对风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验