Suppr超能文献

医疗服务提供者与青光眼患者共同设定治疗目标的情况。

Provider use of collaborative goal setting with glaucoma patients.

作者信息

Sleath Betsy, Slota Catherine, Blalock Susan J, Sayner Robyn, Carpenter Delesha M, Muir Kelly W, Hartnett Mary Elizabeth, Robin Alan L

机构信息

*PhD †PhD candidate ‡PharmD §PhD, MSPH ∥MD University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy (BS, CS, SJB, RS, DMC), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (BS), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (KWM); Durham VA Medical Center, Health Services Research and Development, Durham, North Carolina (KWM); Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (MEH); and Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, and Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (ALR).

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2014 May;91(5):549-55. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000244.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this preliminary study was to describe the extent to which providers used collaborative goal setting and individualized assessment with patients who were newly prescribed glaucoma medications.

METHODS

English-speaking glaucoma suspect patients from six ophthalmology clinics who were newly prescribed glaucoma medications had their medical visits videotaped and were interviewed after the visits. The videotapes were transcribed and coded to examine provider use of collaborative goal setting and individualized assessment.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients seeing 12 ophthalmologists participated. Providers gave patients glaucoma treatment options during 37% of the visits; only five providers gave patients treatment options Providers asked for patient treatment preferences in less than 20% of the visits; only two providers asked for patient treatment preferences. Providers were significantly more likely to ask African American patients for their preferences or ideas concerning treatment than non-African American patients (Pearson χ² = 4.1, p = 0.04). Providers were also significantly more likely to ask African American patients about their confidence in using glaucoma medication regularly than non-African American patients (Pearson χ² = 8.2, p = 0.004). Providers asked about patient views about glaucoma in less than 20% of the visits; five providers asked patients their views on glaucoma and its treatment. Providers were significantly more likely to ask African American patients about their views on glaucoma than non-African American patients (Pearson χ² = 5.62, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Eye care providers often did not use collaborative goal setting or conduct individualized assessments of patient views on glaucoma when prescribing treatment for the first time.

摘要

目的

本初步研究的目的是描述医疗服务提供者在为新开具青光眼药物的患者设定协作目标和进行个性化评估方面的程度。

方法

来自六家眼科诊所的新开具青光眼药物的讲英语的青光眼疑似患者的就诊过程被录像,并在就诊后接受访谈。录像带被转录并编码,以检查医疗服务提供者对协作目标设定和个性化评估的使用情况。

结果

51名患者接受了12名眼科医生的诊治。在37%的就诊过程中,医疗服务提供者向患者提供了青光眼治疗方案;只有5名医疗服务提供者向患者提供了治疗方案。在不到20%的就诊过程中,医疗服务提供者询问了患者的治疗偏好;只有2名医疗服务提供者询问了患者的治疗偏好。与非非裔美国患者相比,医疗服务提供者向非裔美国患者询问其对治疗的偏好或想法的可能性显著更高(Pearson χ² = 4.1,p = 0.04)。与非非裔美国患者相比,医疗服务提供者向非裔美国患者询问其定期使用青光眼药物的信心的可能性也显著更高(Pearson χ² = 8.2,p = 0.004)。在不到20%的就诊过程中,医疗服务提供者询问了患者对青光眼的看法;5名医疗服务提供者询问了患者对青光眼及其治疗的看法。与非非裔美国患者相比,医疗服务提供者向非裔美国患者询问其对青光眼看法的可能性显著更高(Pearson χ² = 5.62,p = 0.02)。

结论

眼科护理提供者在首次开出处方治疗青光眼时,往往没有采用协作目标设定或对患者对青光眼的看法进行个性化评估。

相似文献

1
Provider use of collaborative goal setting with glaucoma patients.
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 May;91(5):549-55. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000244.
2
Patient question-asking about glaucoma and glaucoma medications during videotaped medical visits.
Health Commun. 2015;30(7):660-8. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.888387. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
3
Glaucoma patient-provider communication about vision quality-of-life.
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Apr;100(4):703-709. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.11.018. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
4
5
Glaucoma patient expression of medication problems and nonadherence.
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 May;92(5):537-43. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000574.
6
Communication Predicts Medication Self-Efficacy in Glaucoma Patients.
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Jul;93(7):731-7. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000856.
7
Provider use of a participatory decision-making style with African American patients with glaucoma.
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Jun;111:107679. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107679. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
8
Provider Education about Glaucoma and Glaucoma Medications during Videotaped Medical Visits.
J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:238939. doi: 10.1155/2014/238939. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
9
African American Patient Preferences for Glaucoma Education.
Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Apr;94(4):482-486. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001059.
10
Do African American patients with glaucoma ask their eye providers the questions they have?
Eye (Lond). 2024 Feb;38(2):279-283. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02674-x. Epub 2023 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
African American patient-provider communication about glaucoma vision quality-of-life.
Eye (Lond). 2024 Feb;38(2):343-348. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02693-8. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
2
Do African American patients with glaucoma ask their eye providers the questions they have?
Eye (Lond). 2024 Feb;38(2):279-283. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02674-x. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
Pilot Study of Clinician-Patient Collaboration in Glaucoma.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 23;15:1715-1726. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S292347. eCollection 2021.
4
Text Parsing-Based Identification of Patients with Poor Glaucoma Medication Adherence in the Electronic Health Record.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;222:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient race, reported problems in using glaucoma medications, and adherence.
ISRN Ophthalmol. 2012 Oct 15;2012:902819. doi: 10.5402/2012/902819. eCollection 2012.
2
Goal setting in cardiac rehabilitation: implications for clinical practice.
Contemp Nurse. 2012 Dec;43(1):13-21. doi: 10.5172/conu.2012.43.1.13.
3
Survey on vision-related quality of life and self-management among patients with glaucoma.
J Glaucoma. 2014 Feb;23(2):75-80. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318265bbf3.
4
A coding system to measure elements of shared decision making during psychiatric visits.
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Aug;63(8):779-84. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100496.
5
Shared decision-making and health care expenditures among children with special health care needs.
Pediatrics. 2012 Jan;129(1):99-107. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1352. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
6
Laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma: a report by the american academy of ophthalmology.
Ophthalmology. 2011 Nov;118(11):2296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.037. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
7
Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
8
Risk communication and shared decision making in the care of patients with osteoporosis.
J Clin Densitom. 2010 Oct-Dec;13(4):335-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
9
Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar 15;181(6):566-77. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200906-0907OC. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
10
A comprehensive perspective on patient adherence to topical glaucoma therapy.
Ophthalmology. 2009 Nov;116(11 Suppl):S30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.024.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验