• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多站式面试在牙科学徒选拔中的应用:性别和起始站点的影响。

Multiple mini interviews for selection of dental students: influence of gender and starting station.

机构信息

School of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol, Lower Maudlin St., Bristol BS1 2LY, United Kingdom;

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 2014 Apr;78(4):589-96.

PMID:24706689
Abstract

Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI) are an increasingly popular tool for selecting entrants to undergraduate degree programs in dentistry in the United Kingdom. This article reports on the use of MMI to select dental students at the University of Bristol, United Kingdom, over two successive admissions cycles (2011-12 and 2012-13). MMI provided an efficient means to discriminate between the performance of applicants who were all academically highly qualified, with total scores ranging from 35 percent to 87 percent of the maximum possible score. Female candidates performed significantly better than male candidates when assessed by total score (p=0.011; mean score 94.4 for female applicants and 91.9 for male applicants) and by outcome (offer/decline; p=0.016; 58.6 percent of female and 46.4 percent of male interviewees received an offer of study following interview). There was no statistically significant effect of starting station on candidate performance (p=0.359), indicating that a candidate's overall chance of success in the MMI was not influenced by which station he or she experienced first. Stakeholder acceptance was good, with 75 percent of candidates and 95 percent of assessors preferring MMI over traditional interviews.

摘要

多站式面试(MMI)是英国用于选择牙科学士学位课程入学申请人的一种越来越流行的工具。本文报告了在英国布里斯托大学(University of Bristol)连续两个招生周期(2011-12 年和 2012-13 年)中使用 MMI 选拔牙科学生的情况。MMI 提供了一种有效的方法来区分表现优异的申请人,他们在学术上都非常优秀,总得分范围从最高总分的 35%到 87%。在总得分(p=0.011;女性申请人的平均得分为 94.4,男性申请人的平均得分为 91.9)和结果(录取/拒绝;p=0.016;58.6%的女性和 46.4%的男性面试者在面试后获得了学习机会)方面,女性候选人的表现明显优于男性候选人。候选人的表现与起始站之间没有统计学上的显著影响(p=0.359),这表明候选人在 MMI 中的整体成功机会不受他或她首先经历的站的影响。利益相关者的接受度较好,75%的候选人以及 95%的评估者都更喜欢 MMI 而不是传统面试。

相似文献

1
Multiple mini interviews for selection of dental students: influence of gender and starting station.多站式面试在牙科学徒选拔中的应用:性别和起始站点的影响。
J Dent Educ. 2014 Apr;78(4):589-96.
2
Can Multiple Mini-Interviews Predict Academic Performance of Dental Students? A Two-Year Follow-Up.多次小型面试能否预测牙科学生的学业成绩?一项为期两年的随访研究。
J Dent Educ. 2016 Nov;80(11):1376-1383.
3
Applicants' perceptions on the multiple mini-interview process as a selection tool for dental and therapy and hygiene students.
Br Dent J. 2013 Dec;215(11):565-70. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.1142.
4
Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.多轮迷你面试与传统面试:利益相关者可接受性比较。
Med Educ. 2009 Oct;43(10):993-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03447.x.
5
An evaluation of the multiple mini-interview as a selection tool for dental students.多站式面试评估作为牙科学生选拔工具的效果评价。
Br Dent J. 2012 Apr 13;212(7):331-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.267.
6
Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores.医学院采用多站式面试的招生程序与全国执照考试分数的关联性。
JAMA. 2012 Dec 5;308(21):2233-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.36914.
7
The admissions process in a graduate-entry dental school: can we predict academic performance?研究生入学牙科学校的招生流程:我们能否预测学业表现?
Br Dent J. 2013 Jan;214(2):E4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.56.
8
Gathering validity evidence in the use of multiple mini-interviews as an admission tool for dental students: Preliminary evidence from Saudi Arabia.收集将多次小型面试用作牙科学生录取工具的效度证据:来自沙特阿拉伯的初步证据。
Med Teach. 2016;38 Suppl 1:S45-51. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1142510.
9
What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?与小组面试相比,多次小型面试有什么优势?
Med Educ Online. 2016 Feb 11;21:29874. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.29874. eCollection 2016.
10
The multiple mini-interview for emergency medicine resident selection.用于急诊医学住院医师选拔的多重迷你面试。
J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.119. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveling the playing field: evaluating measurement equivalence in MMIs between genders.公平竞争:评估性别间多重迷你面试中的测量等效性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 28;12:1639532. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1639532. eCollection 2025.
2
The Multiple Mini Interview for admission to nursing - male perspectives.护理专业入学的多重迷你面试——男性视角
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Dec 12;7:283. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000283.1. eCollection 2018.
3
Psychological Benefits and Challenges of Ph.D. Entrance Exam Virtual Interviews During COVID-19 Pandemic: Does Gender Play a Role?
新冠疫情期间博士入学考试虚拟面试的心理益处与挑战:性别是否起作用?
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 25;12:800715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.800715. eCollection 2021.
4
Using Multiple Mini-Interviews for Students' Admissions in Pakistan: A Pilot Study.在巴基斯坦使用多次小型面试进行学生招生:一项试点研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Mar 6;11:179-185. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S246285. eCollection 2020.
5
Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review.多元小型面试作为高等教育招生工具:系统综述的见解
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2019 May 10;14(3):203-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2019.03.006. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?与小组面试相比,多次小型面试有什么优势?
Med Educ Online. 2016 Feb 11;21:29874. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.29874. eCollection 2016.
7
Predictive value of the admissions process and the UK Clinical Aptitude Test in a graduate-entry dental school.研究生入学牙科学院招生流程及英国临床能力测试的预测价值。
Br Dent J. 2015 Jul;218(12):687-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.437.