University of Arizona.
Dev Psychol. 2014 Apr;50(4):1282-4. doi: 10.1037/a0035443.
In this comment, I first highlight the contributions of Robinson-Cimpian, Lubienski, Ganley, and Copur-Gencturk (2014) in particular and a more interdisciplinary approach in general for the subdiscipline of developmental psychology. Second, I identify some historic methodological foci of psychology and encourage Robinson-Cimpian et al. to consider these possibilities. Finally, I end with my perception that the emerging subdiscipline of developmental methodology can provide a common context for interdisciplinary dialogue in developmental science.
在这条评论中，我首先特别强调罗宾逊-坎皮恩、卢比恩斯基、甘利和科普尔-真图尔克（2014 年）的贡献，以及更具跨学科性的方法对发展心理学这一分支学科的普遍贡献。其次，我指出了心理学的一些历史方法焦点，并鼓励罗宾逊-坎皮恩等人考虑这些可能性。最后，我认为新兴的发展方法学分支可以为发展科学中的跨学科对话提供一个共同的背景。
