Suppr超能文献

[白内障高度近视患者中浸没式B超生物测量的准确性]

[Accuracy of immersion B-scan ultrasound biometry in high myopic patients with cataract].

作者信息

Yang Qinghua, Chen Bing, Peng Guanghua, Li Zhaohui, Huang Yifei

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853, China.

Department of Ophthalmology, PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853, China. Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;50(1):32-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of axial length measurement with three methods, that is, immersion B-scan, contact A-scan, and IOLMaster in high myopia with cataract.

METHODS

To analyze the data of the 40 patients (66 eyes), who were all high myopia with cataract and accepted the phacoemulsification and fold-able lens implantation surgery in our hospital from Jan 2012 to May 2012. The measurement of axial length was performed respectively in 66 eyes by immersion B-scan, contact A-scan and IOLMaster. Keratometric power was measured preoperatively by IOLMaster. The IOL power calculation was carried out according to SRK/T formula in the basis of IOLMaster. Their refraction outcome was follow-up three months after operation.

RESULTS

The axial length was (27.91 ± 1.96) mm, (27.71 ± 2.15) mm, (27.88 ± 2.04) mm respectively by immersion B-scan, A-scan and IOLMaster. There was no significant difference between immersion B-scan and IOLMaster method (t = 0.726, P = 0.473). But the axial length measured by contact A-scan was shorter than that tested by immersion B-scan(t = 2.223, P = 0.003) and IOL Master (t = 2.614, P = 0.014) significantly. There was significant difference between immersion B-scan and contact A-Scan method in those patients whose mean absolute refractive error (MARE) was within ± 0.50 Diopter three months after operation (χ(2) = 5.67, P < 0.05) , while there was no significant difference between immersion B-scan and IOLMaster measurement (χ(2) = 0.06, P > 0.05). The same situation happened in those patients whose MARE was within ± 1.00 Diopter. That means, there was significant difference between immersion B-scan measurement and contact A-scan measurement (χ(2) = 4.19, P < 0.05) , while there was no significant difference between immersion B-scan and IOLMaster measurement(χ(2) = 0.36, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The immersion B-Scan measurement is better than A-scan, and it is as accurate as the IOL Master measurement, which is another good choice for the axial length measuring in high myopia with cataract cases.

摘要

目的

比较三种测量眼轴长度的方法(即浸没式B超、接触式A超和IOLMaster)在高度近视合并白内障患者中的准确性。

方法

分析2012年1月至2012年5月在我院接受白内障超声乳化折叠人工晶状体植入手术的40例(66只眼)高度近视合并白内障患者的数据。分别用浸没式B超、接触式A超和IOLMaster测量66只眼的眼轴长度。术前用IOLMaster测量角膜曲率。根据IOLMaster测量结果,采用SRK/T公式计算人工晶状体度数。术后3个月随访其屈光结果。

结果

浸没式B超、A超和IOLMaster测量的眼轴长度分别为(27.91±1.96)mm、(27.71±2.15)mm、(27.88±2.04)mm。浸没式B超与IOLMaster测量方法之间差异无统计学意义(t = 0.726,P = 0.473)。但接触式A超测量的眼轴长度明显短于浸没式B超(t = 2.223,P = 0.003)和IOLMaster测量的结果(t = 2.614,P = 0.014)。术后3个月平均绝对屈光误差(MARE)在±0.50 D范围内的患者,浸没式B超与接触式A超测量方法之间差异有统计学意义(χ(2)=5.67,P<0.05),而浸没式B超与IOLMaster测量之间差异无统计学意义(χ(2)=0.06,P>0.05)。MARE在±1.00 D范围内的患者情况相同。即浸没式B超测量与接触式A超测量之间差异有统计学意义(χ(2)=4.19,P<0.05),而浸没式B超与IOLMaster测量之间差异无统计学意义(χ(2)=0.36,P>0.05)。

结论

浸没式B超测量优于A超,与IOLMaster测量准确性相当,是高度近视合并白内障患者眼轴长度测量的另一种较好选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验