• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现代韩国社会临终决策中对自主权的偏好。

Preferences for autonomy in end-of-life decision making in modern Korean society.

作者信息

Kim Su Hyun

机构信息

Kyungpook National University, Korea

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2015 Mar;22(2):228-36. doi: 10.1177/0969733014523168. Epub 2014 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1177/0969733014523168
PMID:24714047
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The demand for autonomy in medical decision making is increasing among Korean people, but it is not well known why some people prefer autonomy in decision making but others do not.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which Korean adults wished to exercise autonomy in the process of decision making regarding end-of-life treatment and to determine whether economic issues and family functioning, in particular, were associated with preferences for participation in decision making in Korean people.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This study was a cross-sectional correlational study using a survey.

PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT

Data were collected using structured questionnaires from 354 patients or their families who visited ambulatory departments at two general hospitals in South Korea, recruited by the proportionate quota sampling method. Data analysis was performed using multinomial logistic regression analyses.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The study was approved by the hospitals' directors and the ethics committee of Kyungpook National University Hospital. Written informed consent was given by all participants.

FINDINGS

A majority of Korean people wanted to make autonomous decisions regarding treatment at the end of life. Preferences for autonomous decision making regarding end-of-life treatment, rather than relying on family, showed a significant increase in association with poor family functioning and low income.

DISCUSSION

Results of this study suggested the necessity for development of alternatives to a dominant traditional "family-centered" approach in Korean people, in order to enhance end-of-life decision making for people who wish to take an active role in the decision-making process.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare providers need to examine not only patients' preferred decision-making style but also any reasons for their choice, in particular, family conflict and financial burden.

摘要

背景

韩国民众对医疗决策自主权的需求日益增加,但为何有些人在决策中倾向于自主权而另一些人则不然,这一点尚不为人所知。

研究目的

本研究旨在确定韩国成年人在临终治疗决策过程中希望行使自主权的程度,并确定经济问题和家庭功能,尤其是与韩国人参与决策偏好之间是否存在关联。

研究设计

本研究是一项采用调查的横断面相关性研究。

参与者与研究背景

通过比例配额抽样法,从韩国两家综合医院门诊就诊的354名患者或其家属中,使用结构化问卷收集数据。采用多项逻辑回归分析进行数据分析。

伦理考量

该研究获得了医院院长和庆北国立大学医院伦理委员会的批准。所有参与者均签署了书面知情同意书。

研究结果

大多数韩国人希望在临终治疗方面做出自主决策。与依赖家庭相比,对临终治疗自主决策的偏好与家庭功能不良和低收入显著相关。

讨论

本研究结果表明,有必要为韩国人开发替代主导传统“以家庭为中心”方法的方案,以加强那些希望在决策过程中发挥积极作用的人的临终决策。

结论

医疗服务提供者不仅需要检查患者偏好的决策方式,还需要检查其选择的任何原因,特别是家庭冲突和经济负担。

相似文献

1
Preferences for autonomy in end-of-life decision making in modern Korean society.现代韩国社会临终决策中对自主权的偏好。
Nurs Ethics. 2015 Mar;22(2):228-36. doi: 10.1177/0969733014523168. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
2
Autonomy at the end of life: life-prolonging treatment in nursing homes--relatives' role in the decision-making process.生命末期的自主权:养老院中的延长生命治疗——亲属在决策过程中的角色。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Nov;35(11):672-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.030668.
3
Decision-making preferences on end-of-life care for older people: Exploration and comparison of Japan, the Hong Kong SAR and South Korea in East Asia.东亚地区老年人临终关怀决策偏好:日本、中国香港特别行政区和韩国的探索与比较。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Dec;31(23-24):3498-3509. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16178. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Palliative care nursing involvement in end-of-life decision-making: Qualitative secondary analysis.姑息护理护理在临终决策中的参与:定性二次分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Sep;26(6):1680-1695. doi: 10.1177/0969733018774610. Epub 2018 May 28.
6
Is patient autonomy a critical determinant of quality of life in Korea? End-of-life decision making from the perspective of the patient.患者自主性是否是韩国生活质量的关键决定因素?从患者角度看临终决策。
Palliat Med. 2012 Apr;26(3):222-31. doi: 10.1177/0269216311405089. Epub 2011 May 11.
7
Patients' perceived purpose of clinical informed consent: Mill's individual autonomy model is preferred.患者对临床知情同意的认知目的:密尔的个人自主模型更受青睐。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Jan 10;15:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-2.
8
Patient autonomy in dentistry: demonstrating the role for shared decision making.牙科中的患者自主权:展示共同决策的作用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 2;20(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01317-5.
9
Ethical issues in communication of diagnosis and end-of-life decision-making process in some of the Romanian Roma communities.罗马尼亚一些罗姆社区中诊断沟通与临终决策过程中的伦理问题。
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Aug;16(3):483-97. doi: 10.1007/s11019-012-9425-5.
10
Decisional conflict in end-of-life cancer treatment among family surrogates: A cross-sectional survey.家庭替代决策者在癌症终末期治疗中的决策冲突:一项横断面调查。
Nurs Health Sci. 2018 Dec;20(4):472-478. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12537. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparity in attitudes regarding assisted dying among physicians and the general public in Japan.日本医生和普通公众在对协助死亡的态度上存在差异。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jan 20;26(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01166-9.
2
Difficulties Doctors Experience during Life-Sustaining Treatment Discussion after Enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act: A Cross-Sectional Study.《生命维持治疗决策法案颁布后医生在进行生命维持治疗讨论时所面临的困难:一项横断面研究》
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;53(2):584-592. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.735. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
3
End-of-Life Decision Making in Palliative Care and Recommendations of the Council of Europe: Qualitative Secondary Analysis of Interviews and Observation Field Notes.
终末期决策制定在姑息治疗和欧洲理事会的建议:访谈和观察现场记录的定性二次分析。
J Palliat Med. 2018 May;21(5):604-615. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0403. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
4
The Role of Patients' Families in Cancer Treatment Decision-Making: Perspectives among Eastern and Western families.患者家庭在癌症治疗决策中的作用:东西方家庭的观点
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2017 Nov;17(4):e383-e385. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2017.17.04.001. Epub 2018 Jan 10.