• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意负载下知觉选择性的新视角。

A new perspective on the perceptual selectivity of attention under load.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and The Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California.

出版信息

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 May;1316:71-86. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12404. Epub 2014 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1111/nyas.12404
PMID:24716751
Abstract

The human attention system helps us cope with a complex environment by supporting the selective processing of information relevant to our current goals. Understanding the perceptual, cognitive, and neural mechanisms that mediate selective attention is a core issue in cognitive neuroscience. One prominent model of selective attention, known as load theory, offers an account of how task demands determine when information is selected and an account of the efficiency of the selection process. However, load theory has several critical weaknesses that suggest that it is time for a new perspective. Here we review the strengths and weaknesses of load theory and offer an alternative biologically plausible computational account that is based on the neural theory of visual attention. We argue that this new perspective provides a detailed computational account of how bottom-up and top-down information is integrated to provide efficient attentional selection and allocation of perceptual processing resources.

摘要

人类注意系统通过支持对与当前目标相关的信息进行选择性处理,帮助我们应对复杂的环境。理解介导选择性注意的感知、认知和神经机制是认知神经科学的核心问题。选择性注意的一个突出模型,即负荷理论,提供了一种关于任务需求如何决定信息何时被选择的解释,以及关于选择过程效率的解释。然而,负荷理论有几个关键的弱点,这表明它是时候采用一种新的视角了。在这里,我们回顾了负荷理论的优缺点,并提供了一个基于视觉注意的神经理论的替代的、具有生物学意义的计算解释。我们认为,这种新视角提供了一个详细的计算解释,说明如何整合自上而下和自下而上的信息,以提供有效的注意力选择和感知处理资源的分配。

相似文献

1
A new perspective on the perceptual selectivity of attention under load.注意负载下知觉选择性的新视角。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 May;1316:71-86. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12404. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
2
Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: a computational approach.理解在部分报告中面对不同感知负荷时注意力的分配:一种计算方法。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 May;49(6):1487-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.039. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
3
Auditory working memory load impairs visual ventral stream processing: toward a unified model of attentional load.听觉工作记忆负荷会损害视觉腹侧流加工:迈向注意负荷的统一模型。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Mar;22(3):437-46. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21204.
4
Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?二十年的负荷理论——我们现在何处,下一步该走向何方?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1316-1340. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0982-5.
5
Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.在不同感知负荷下处理多维物体:自下而上感知显著性的优先级
Brain Res. 2006 Oct 9;1114(1):113-24. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.071. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
6
A computational approach to prefrontal cortex, cognitive control and schizophrenia: recent developments and current challenges.一种针对前额叶皮质、认知控制与精神分裂症的计算方法:最新进展与当前挑战。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 29;351(1346):1515-27. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0138.
7
Attention, short-term memory, and action selection: a unifying theory.注意力、短期记忆与行动选择:一种统一理论。
Prog Neurobiol. 2005 Jul;76(4):236-56. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.08.004. Epub 2005 Oct 27.
8
Perceptual load influences selective attention across development.感知负载会影响发展过程中的选择性注意。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;47(5):1431-9. doi: 10.1037/a0024027.
9
Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.选择性注意与认知控制的负载理论。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):339-54. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339.
10
Attentional control: brief and prolonged.注意力控制:短暂与持久。
Psychol Res. 2002 Nov;66(4):220-33. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0097-2. Epub 2002 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Better than expected performance effect depends on the spatial location of visual stimulus.优于预期的表现效果取决于视觉刺激的空间位置。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82146-8.
2
Perceptual Difficulty Regulates Attentional Gain Modulations in Human Visual Cortex.知觉难度调节人类视觉皮层的注意增益调制。
J Neurosci. 2023 May 3;43(18):3312-3330. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0519-22.2023. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
3
Nonlinear Effects of Linearly Increasing Perceptual Load on ERPs to Emotional Pictures.线性增加的知觉负荷对情绪图片的事件相关电位的非线性影响。
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2020 Jul 29;1(1):tgaa040. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa040. eCollection 2020.
4
Contrasting the Effects of Task Difficulty and Perceptual Load on Auditory Detection Sensitivity in Individuals with Autism.对比孤独症个体在任务难度和知觉负载下对听觉检测敏感性的影响。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Feb;49(2):762-772. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3766-8.
5
Can automaticity be verified utilizing a perceptual load manipulation?能否利用知觉负载操作来验证自动性?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2037-2046. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1444-7.
6
Acute Stress and Perceptual Load Consume the Same Attentional Resources: A Behavioral-ERP Study.急性应激与知觉负荷消耗相同的注意资源:一项行为-事件相关电位研究。
PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0154622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154622. eCollection 2016.
7
Modeling the Effects of Perceptual Load: Saliency, Competitive Interactions, and Top-Down Biases.模拟知觉负载的影响:显著性、竞争交互作用和自上而下的偏差。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 26;7:1. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00001. eCollection 2016.
8
Unveiling residual, spontaneous recovery from subtle hemispatial neglect three years after stroke.揭示中风三年后细微半侧空间忽视的残余、自发恢复情况。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jul 30;9:413. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00413. eCollection 2015.
9
Distractor suppression when attention fails: behavioral evidence for a flexible selective attention mechanism.注意力失败时的干扰项抑制:灵活选择性注意机制的行为证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0126203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126203. eCollection 2015.
10
Accurate expectancies diminish perceptual distraction during visual search.准确的预期会减少视觉搜索过程中的感知分心。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 27;8:334. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00334. eCollection 2014.