BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Apr;2(2):187-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.01.001.
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between fatigue and clinical outcomes, using dyspnea as a comparator, in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% enrolled in the CORONA (Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in Heart Failure) study.
Although fatigue is a common symptom in heart failure (HF), little is known about its association with prognosis.
At baseline in CORONA, fatigue "during the past few days" was measured using a 5-point exertion scale (0 = none, 1 = heavy exertion, 2 = moderate exertion, 3 = slight exertion, 4 = rest); a 4-point scale was used for dyspnea (1 to 4 as for fatigue). Patients were grouped into 3 categories: a fatigue score 0 to 1 (n = 535), fatigue score 2 (n = 1,632), and fatigue score 3 to 4 (n = 1,663); and a dyspnea score of 1 (n = 292), dyspnea score of 2 (n = 1,695), and dyspnea score of 3 to 4 (n = 1,843). The association between fatigue and dyspnea and the composite outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death or HF hospital stay and each component separately was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional-hazard models. We also examined all-cause mortality.
In univariate analyses, symptom severity was associated with a higher risk of CV death or HF hospital stay (fatigue: group 3, 49% [n = 810], vs. group 1, 30% [n = 160]; dyspnea: group 3, 50% [n = 918], vs. group 1, 28% [n = 82]) and all-cause mortality (fatigue: group 3, 38% [n = 623], vs. group 1, 24% [n = 130]; dyspnea: group 3, 38% [n = 697], vs. group 1, 23% [n = 66], log-rank p < 0.0001 for all). After adjusting for other prognostic variables, including LVEF, New York Heart Association class, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level, worse fatigue remained associated with higher risk of HF hospital stay but not mortality (worse dyspnea remained associated with a higher risk of both). An increase in fatigue (or dyspnea) between baseline and 6 months was also associated with worse outcomes.
In HF, greater fatigue is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Closer attention should be paid to this symptom in clinical practice, with more done to standardize its measurement and understand its origins, with a view to improving treatment.
本研究旨在通过呼吸困难作为对照,检查射血分数(LVEF)≤35%的 CORONA(控制瑞舒伐他汀多国心力衰竭试验)研究患者的疲劳与临床结局之间的关系。
尽管疲劳是心力衰竭(HF)的常见症状,但对其预后的关联知之甚少。
在 CORONA 中,使用 5 点用力量表(0 = 无,1 = 剧烈用力,2 = 中度用力,3 = 轻微用力,4 = 休息)测量过去几天的疲劳程度;使用 4 点量表测量呼吸困难(1 到 4 与疲劳相同)。患者分为 3 组:疲劳评分 0 到 1(n = 535)、疲劳评分 2(n = 1632)和疲劳评分 3 到 4(n = 1663);呼吸困难评分 1(n = 292)、呼吸困难评分 2(n = 1695)和呼吸困难评分 3 到 4(n = 1843)。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析和 Cox 比例风险模型检查疲劳和呼吸困难与心血管(CV)死亡或 HF 住院的复合结局以及每个组成部分之间的关联。我们还检查了全因死亡率。
在单变量分析中,症状严重程度与 CV 死亡或 HF 住院的风险增加相关(疲劳:组 3,49% [n = 810],与组 1,30% [n = 160];呼吸困难:组 3,50% [n = 918],与组 1,28% [n = 82])和全因死亡率(疲劳:组 3,38% [n = 623],与组 1,24% [n = 130];呼吸困难:组 3,38% [n = 697],与组 1,23% [n = 66],对数秩 p < 0.0001)。在调整其他预后变量(包括 LVEF、纽约心脏协会分级和 N 末端 B 型利钠肽前体水平)后,更严重的疲劳仍与 HF 住院的风险增加相关,但与死亡率无关(更严重的呼吸困难仍与两者的风险增加相关)。基线和 6 个月之间疲劳(或呼吸困难)的增加也与更差的结局相关。
在 HF 中,更严重的疲劳与更差的临床结局相关。在临床实践中应更加关注这一症状,并进一步努力规范其测量方法并了解其起源,以期改善治疗。