Alves-Junior Eduardo R, Gomes Luciano T, Ribatski-Silva Daniele, Mendes Clebson Rodrigues J, Leal-Santos Fabio A, Simões Luciano R, Mello Marcia Beatriz C, Fontes Cor Jesus F
Julio Müller Hospital, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil; Biomedicine Department, Univag University Centre, Varzea Grande, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Julio Müller Hospital, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil; Biomedicine Department, Univag University Centre, Varzea Grande, Mato Grosso, Brazil; Medical Department, Facimed Course of Medicine, Cacoal, Rondônia, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 10;9(4):e94193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094193. eCollection 2014.
Quantification of parasite density is an important component in the diagnosis of malaria infection. The accuracy of this estimation varies according to the method used. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between the parasite density values obtained with the assumed value of 8,000 cells/μL and the automated WBC count. Moreover, the same comparative analysis was carried out for other assumed values of WBCs. The study was carried out in Brazil with 403 malaria patients who were infected in different endemic areas of the Brazilian Amazon. The use of a fixed WBC count of 8,000 cells/μL to quantify parasite density in malaria patients led to overestimated parasitemia and resulted in low reliability when compared to the automated WBC count. Assumed values ranging between 5,000 and 6,000 cells/μL, and 5,500 cells/μL in particular, showed higher reliability and more similar values of parasite density when compared between the 2 methods. The findings show that assumed WBC count of 5,500 cells/μL could lead to a more accurate estimation of parasite density for malaria patients in this endemic region.
疟原虫密度的定量是疟疾感染诊断的重要组成部分。这种估计的准确性因所使用的方法而异。本研究的目的是评估假定值为8000个细胞/微升时获得的疟原虫密度值与白细胞自动计数之间的一致性。此外,对白细胞的其他假定值进行了相同的比较分析。该研究在巴西对403名在巴西亚马逊不同流行地区感染疟疾的患者进行。使用固定的白细胞计数8000个细胞/微升来定量疟疾患者的疟原虫密度会导致疟原虫血症估计过高,与白细胞自动计数相比可靠性较低。假定值在5000至6000个细胞/微升之间,特别是5500个细胞/微升,在两种方法比较时显示出更高的可靠性和更相似的疟原虫密度值。研究结果表明,假定白细胞计数为5500个细胞/微升可以更准确地估计该流行地区疟疾患者的疟原虫密度。