Tarzia Vincenzo, Carrozzini Massimiliano, Bortolussi Giacomo, Buratto Edward, Bejko Jonida, Comisso Marina, Mescola Valentina, Penzo Valentina, Guarino Mauro, De Franceschi Marco, Pagnin Chiara, Castoro Massimo, Guglielmi Cosimo, Testolin Luca, Bottio Tomaso, Gerosa Gino
Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Cardiac Surgery Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Cardiac Surgery Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;19(1):70-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu101. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
Sternal wound dehiscence (SWD) after cardiac surgery is a rare but serious condition associated with considerable costs and morbidity. We sought to evaluate the results of the introduction of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy in the management of sternal wound dehiscence, compared with those of previous conventional treatments.
We retrospectively collected 7148 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our institution between January 2002 and June 2012. A total of 152 (2.1%) patients had a sternal wound dehiscence: 107 were treated with conventional treatments (Group A) and 45 were managed with VAC therapy (Group B). Patients were stratified according to preoperative risk factors and type of sternal wound dehiscence (superficial or deep; infected or not) and compared by means of a propensity-matched analysis. A cost analysis was also performed.
Forty-five patients of each group matched for all preoperative risk factors and type of sternal wound dehiscence. SWD-related mortality rate was significantly lower in Group B (11 vs 0%; P = 0.05). Incidence of mediastinitis (P < 0.0001), sepsis (P = 0.04), delayed SWD infection (P = 0.05), other complication (P = 0.05), surgical sternal revision (P = 0.04) and surgical superficial revision (P < 0.0001) were all significantly lower in Group B. Mean patient cost was 31 106€ in Group A and 24 383€ in Group B, thus achieving a mean saving of 6723€ per patient.
In our experience, the use of VAC therapy for the management of SWD was considerably effective in decreasing mortality (SWD related), incidence of complications and need for surgical procedures; thus, leading to a significant reduction of costs.
心脏手术后胸骨伤口裂开(SWD)是一种罕见但严重的情况,会产生相当高的费用并导致发病。我们试图评估与以往传统治疗方法相比,采用负压封闭引流(VAC)疗法治疗胸骨伤口裂开的效果。
我们回顾性收集了2002年1月至2012年6月在我院接受心脏手术的7148例患者。共有152例(2.1%)患者发生胸骨伤口裂开:107例采用传统治疗方法(A组),45例采用VAC疗法(B组)。根据术前危险因素和胸骨伤口裂开类型(表浅或深部;感染或未感染)对患者进行分层,并通过倾向匹配分析进行比较。还进行了成本分析。
每组各有45例患者在所有术前危险因素和胸骨伤口裂开类型方面相匹配。B组SWD相关死亡率显著更低(11%对0%;P = 0.05)。B组纵隔炎发生率(P < 0.0001)、脓毒症发生率(P = 0.04)、延迟性SWD感染发生率(P = 0.05)、其他并发症发生率(P = 0.05)、胸骨手术翻修率(P = 0.04)和手术表浅翻修率(P < 0.0001)均显著更低。A组患者平均费用为31106欧元,B组为24383欧元,因此每位患者平均节省6723欧元。
根据我们的经验,使用VAC疗法治疗SWD在降低死亡率(与SWD相关)、并发症发生率以及手术需求方面相当有效;从而显著降低了成本。