Stoychev S D, Conifer C M, Uhe A, Hölscher M, Leitner Walter
Institut für Technische und Makromolekulare Chemie, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Dalton Trans. 2014 Aug 7;43(29):11180-9. doi: 10.1039/c4dt00294f. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
A recent DFT study of the ruthenium pincer benzoate complex [Ru(PNP)(PhCOO)2] I (PNP = 2,6-bis(diphenylphosphanyl)lutidine) in its meridional form has revealed mer-I to be a promising catalyst lead structure for the direct insertion of CO2 into the C-H bonds of arenes, such as benzene. After the successful synthesis of I, its solid state structure interestingly and unexpectedly showed the pincer ligand to adopt the facial rather than the meridional coordination mode. Recalculation of the catalytic cycle with fac-I including all relevant local minima and transition states revealed (a) fac-I to be significantly more stable (6.1 kcal mol(-1)) than mer-I, (b) that the energetic span (ES; i.e. the effective activation barrier) for the cycle with fac-I amounts to 38.8 kcal mol(-1), while the cycle with mer-I has an ES of 25.5 kcal mol(-1) only. These results are a hint that fac-I is catalytically inactive. Experimental testing of fac-I showed indeed no product formation, which is in full accordance with the computations. To reduce the spatial flexibility of the pincer ligand, its CH2 groups were replaced by O atoms. The resulting complex [Ru(PONOP)(PhCOO)2] II (PONOP = 2,6-bis(diphenylphosphinito)pyridine) was used for the calculation of the catalytic cycle in benzene as the solvent. Gratifyingly, the starting complex mer-II is more stable than fac-II by 1.9 kcal mol(-1) in benzene as the solvent. Consequently, mer-II should be available experimentally. As with fac-I, also fac-II generates a catalytic cycle with a high ES (37.1 kcal mol(-1)), while mer-II generates a cycle with a significantly lower ES (27.2 kcal mol(-1)) indicating mer-II to be a potentially active catalyst. A possible explanation of the much lower ES in the case of the meridionally coordinated species is found in the stronger interaction of the substrate with the metal center in the arene-σ-bond complex. As a result the issue that is created by the mer/fac isomerism can be resolved by creating spatially less flexible structures.
最近一项对苯甲酸根钌钳形配合物[Ru(PNP)(PhCOO)₂] I(PNP = 2,6 - 双(二苯基膦基)卢剔啶)经式形式的密度泛函理论(DFT)研究表明,经式I是一种很有前景的催化剂前体结构,可用于将二氧化碳直接插入芳烃(如苯)的C - H键中。成功合成I后,其固态结构有趣且出人意料地显示钳形配体采取的是面式而非经式配位模式。对包含所有相关局部极小值和过渡态的面式I催化循环进行重新计算发现:(a)面式I比经式I稳定得多(6.1千卡/摩尔);(b)面式I催化循环的能量跨度(ES,即有效活化能垒)为38.8千卡/摩尔,而经式I催化循环的ES仅为25.5千卡/摩尔。这些结果表明面式I无催化活性。对面式I的实验测试确实未检测到产物生成,这与计算结果完全相符。为降低钳形配体的空间灵活性,将其CH₂基团替换为O原子。所得配合物[Ru(PONOP)(PhCOO)₂] II(PONOP = 2,6 - 双(二苯基次膦酸酯基)吡啶)用于以苯为溶剂时催化循环的计算。令人欣慰的是,在以苯为溶剂的情况下,起始配合物经式II比面式II稳定1.9千卡/摩尔。因此,经式II应该可以通过实验得到。与面式I一样,面式II也产生一个具有高ES(37.1千卡/摩尔)的催化循环,而经式II产生一个ES显著更低(27.2千卡/摩尔)的循环,这表明经式II是一种潜在的活性催化剂。对于经式配位物种ES低得多的情况,一种可能的解释是底物与芳烃 - σ - 键配合物中的金属中心相互作用更强。因此,通过创建空间灵活性较小的结构,可以解决经式/面式异构现象带来的问题。