van Deurssen Erik, Pronk Anjoeka, Spaan Suzanne, Goede Henk, Tielemans Erik, Heederik Dick, Meijster Tim
1.Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, PO Box 80178, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands 2.TNO, Utrechtseweg 48, PO Box 360, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands
2.TNO, Utrechtseweg 48, PO Box 360, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2014 Jul;58(6):724-38. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meu021. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
Quartz exposure can cause several respiratory health effects. Although quartz exposure has been described in several observational workplace studies, well-designed intervention studies that investigate the effect of control strategies are lacking. This article describes a baseline exposure study that is part of a multidimensional intervention program aiming to reduce quartz exposure among construction workers. In this study, personal respirable dust and quartz exposure was assessed among 116 construction workers (bricklayers, carpenters, concrete drillers, demolishers, and tuck pointers). Possible determinants of exposure, like job, tasks, and work practices, use of control measures, and organizational and psychosocial factors, were explored using exposure models for respirable dust and quartz separately. Stratified analyses by job title were performed to evaluate the effect of control measures on exposure and to explore the association between control measures and psychosocial factors. Overall, 62% of all measurements exceeded the Dutch occupational exposure limit for quartz and 11% for respirable dust. Concrete drillers and tuck pointers had the highest exposures for quartz and respirable dust (0.20 and 3.43mg m(-3), respectively). Significant predictors of elevated quartz exposure were abrasive tasks and type of material worked on. Surprisingly, in a univariate model, an increased knowledge level was associated with an increase in exposure. Although control measures were used infrequently, if used they resulted in approximately 40% reduction in quartz exposure among concrete drillers and tuck pointers. Only among concrete drillers, the use of control measures was associated with a higher score for social influence (factor 1.6); knowledge showed an inverse association with use of control measures for concrete drillers, demolishers, and tuck pointers. In conclusion, the detailed information on determinants of exposure, use of control measures, and constraints to use these control measures can be used for the determination and systematic prioritization of intervention measures used to design and implement our intervention strategy. This study underlines the need for multidisciplinary workplace exposure control strategies although larger study populations are necessary to determine a possible causal association between organizational and psychosocial factors and psychosocial factors and control measures.
接触石英会对呼吸系统健康产生多种影响。尽管在多项观察性工作场所研究中已对石英接触情况有所描述,但缺乏精心设计的、用于研究控制策略效果的干预性研究。本文介绍了一项基线接触研究,该研究是一项多维干预计划的一部分,旨在减少建筑工人的石英接触。在这项研究中,对116名建筑工人(砌砖工、木匠、混凝土钻孔工、拆除工和勾缝工)的个人可吸入粉尘和石英接触情况进行了评估。分别使用可吸入粉尘和石英的接触模型,探讨了接触的可能决定因素,如工作、任务和工作方式、控制措施的使用以及组织和社会心理因素。按工作岗位进行分层分析,以评估控制措施对接触的影响,并探讨控制措施与社会心理因素之间的关联。总体而言,所有测量中有62%超过了荷兰石英职业接触限值,11%超过了可吸入粉尘职业接触限值。混凝土钻孔工和勾缝工的石英和可吸入粉尘接触量最高(分别为0.20和3.43mg/m³)。石英接触量升高的显著预测因素是研磨性任务和所加工材料的类型。令人惊讶的是,在单变量模型中,知识水平的提高与接触量的增加相关。尽管控制措施使用频率不高,但如果使用,可使混凝土钻孔工和勾缝工的石英接触量降低约40%。仅在混凝土钻孔工中,控制措施的使用与社会影响得分较高(系数1.6)相关;对于混凝土钻孔工、拆除工和勾缝工,知识与控制措施的使用呈负相关。总之,关于接触决定因素、控制措施使用情况以及使用这些控制措施的制约因素的详细信息,可用于确定和系统地确定用于设计和实施我们干预策略的干预措施的优先级。本研究强调了多学科工作场所接触控制策略的必要性,尽管需要更大的研究群体来确定组织和社会心理因素与社会心理因素及控制措施之间可能的因果关联。