Ebrahimi Ardalan, Clark Jonathan R, Amit M, Yen T C, Liao Chun-Ta, Kowalski Luis P, Kreppel Matthias, Cernea Claudio R, Bachar Gideon, Villaret Andrea Bolzoni, Fliss Dan, Fridman Eran, Robbins K T, Shah Jatin P, Patel Snehal G, Gil Ziv
Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia,
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;21(9):3049-55. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3702-x. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
There is evidence to suggest that a nodal yield <18 is an independent prognostic factor in patients with clinically node negative (cN0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with elective neck dissection (END). We sought to evaluate this hypothesis with external validation and to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions.
We analyzed pooled individual data from 1,567 patients treated at nine comprehensive cancer centers worldwide between 1970 and 2011. Nodal yield was assessed with Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by study center, and adjusted for age, sex, pathological T and N stage, margin status, extracapsular nodal spread, time period of primary treatment, and adjuvant therapy. Two-stage random-effects meta-analyses were used to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions.
In multivariable analyses of patients undergoing selective neck dissection, nodal yield <18 was associated with reduced overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.69; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.22-2.34; p = 0.002] and disease-specific survival (HR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.21-2.91; p = 0.005), and increased risk of locoregional recurrence (HR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.04-2.26; p = 0.032). Despite significant differences between institutions in terms of patient clinicopathological factors, nodal yield, and outcomes, random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated no evidence of heterogeneity between centers in regards to the impact of nodal yield on disease-specific survival (p = 0.663; I (2) statistic = 0).
Our data confirm that nodal yield is a robust independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing END for cN0 oral SCC, and may be applied irrespective of the underlying patient population and treating institution. A minimum adequate lymphadenectomy in this setting should include at least 18 nodes.
有证据表明,在接受择区性颈清扫术(END)治疗的临床淋巴结阴性(cN0)口腔鳞状细胞癌(SCC)患者中,淋巴结检出数<18是一个独立的预后因素。我们试图通过外部验证来评估这一假设,并研究各机构之间的异质性。
我们分析了1970年至2011年间在全球9家综合癌症中心接受治疗的1567例患者的汇总个体数据。使用Cox比例风险模型评估淋巴结检出数,并按研究中心进行分层,同时对年龄、性别、病理T和N分期、切缘状态、包膜外淋巴结转移、初次治疗时间和辅助治疗进行调整。采用两阶段随机效应荟萃分析来研究各机构之间的异质性。
在对接受选择性颈清扫术的患者进行的多变量分析中,淋巴结检出数<18与总生存率降低相关[风险比(HR)1.69;95%置信区间(CI)1.22 - 2.34;p = 0.002]以及疾病特异性生存率降低相关(HR 1.88;95% CI 1.21 - 2.91;p = 0.005),并且局部区域复发风险增加(HR 1.53;95% CI 1.04 - 2.26;p = 0.032)。尽管各机构在患者临床病理因素、淋巴结检出数和结局方面存在显著差异,但随机效应荟萃分析表明,在淋巴结检出数对疾病特异性生存率的影响方面,各中心之间没有异质性证据(p = 0.663;I²统计量 = 0)。
我们的数据证实,对于cN0口腔SCC接受END治疗的患者,淋巴结检出数是一个可靠的独立预后因素,并且无论基础患者群体和治疗机构如何均可应用。在这种情况下,最小充分的淋巴结清扫应包括至少18个淋巴结。