Usichenko Taras I, Wesolowski Toni, Lotze Martin
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medicine of Greifswald, Fleischmannstr. 42-44, 17475, Greifswald, Germany,
Brain Imaging Behav. 2015 Jun;9(2):236-44. doi: 10.1007/s11682-014-9301-4.
Although acupuncture is effective for treating pain, its site-specificity is questioned. The aim was to compare the cerebral responses of needling applied to an acupuncture point to the needling of a sham point, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Twenty-one healthy male volunteers were enrolled. Manual stimulation of the acupuncture (ST44) and sham points on the dorsum of the left foot was applied during fMRI in a crossover manner. fMRI data analysis was performed contrasting the ST44 and the sham conditions. Stimulation intensity, subjective discrimination of the needling site and the incidence of "Qi" sensation were additionally recorded. Stimulation of ST44 acupoint, in comparison to the sham procedure, was associated with an increased fMRI-activation in the primary somatosensory, the inferior parietal and the prefrontal cortex and the posterior insula. Sham needling was associated with increased activation in the anterior cingulate cortex and the anterior insula. Verum acupuncture increased the activity of discriminative somatosensory and cognitive pain processing areas of the brain, whereas sham needling activated the areas responsible for affective processing of pain. This may explain favorable effects of verum acupuncture in clinical studies about treatment of chronic pain patients.
尽管针刺疗法对疼痛治疗有效,但其部位特异性仍受到质疑。本研究旨在使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)比较针刺穴位与假穴位时的脑反应。招募了21名健康男性志愿者。在fMRI期间,以交叉方式对左脚背的针刺穴位(ST44)和假穴位进行手动刺激。进行fMRI数据分析,对比ST44和假刺激条件。另外记录刺激强度、针刺部位的主观辨别以及“气”感的发生率。与假刺激程序相比,针刺ST44穴位与初级体感皮层、顶下小叶、前额叶皮层和后岛叶的fMRI激活增加有关。假针刺与前扣带回皮层和前岛叶的激活增加有关。真针刺增加了大脑中辨别性体感和认知性疼痛处理区域的活动,而假针刺激活了负责疼痛情感处理的区域。这可能解释了真针刺在慢性疼痛患者治疗临床研究中的良好效果。