• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从隐私权衡角度理解消费者对个性化营养服务的评价:一项定性研究。

Understanding consumer evaluations of personalised nutrition services in terms of the privacy calculus: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Berezowska Aleksandra, Fischer Arnout R H, Ronteltap Amber, Kuznesof Sharron, Macready Anna, Fallaize Rosalind, van Trijp Hans C M

机构信息

Department of Social Sciences, Marketing and Consumer Behaviour Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2014;17(3):127-40. doi: 10.1159/000358851. Epub 2014 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1159/000358851
PMID:24732571
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Personalised nutrition (PN) may provide major health benefits to consumers. A potential barrier to the uptake of PN is consumers' reluctance to disclose sensitive information upon which PN is based. This study adopts the privacy calculus to explore how PN service attributes contribute to consumers' privacy risk and personalisation benefit perceptions.

METHODS

Sixteen focus groups (n = 124) were held in 8 EU countries and discussed 9 PN services that differed in terms of personal information, communication channel, service provider, advice justification, scope, frequency, and customer lock-in. Transcripts were content analysed.

RESULTS

The personal information that underpinned PN contributed to both privacy risk perception and personalisation benefit perception. Disclosing information face-to-face mitigated the perception of privacy risk and amplified the perception of personalisation benefit. PN provided by a qualified expert and justified by scientific evidence increased participants' value perception. Enhancing convenience, offering regular face-to face support, and employing customer lock-in strategies were perceived as beneficial.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that to encourage consumer adoption, PN has to account for face-to-face communication, expert advice providers, support, a lifestyle-change focus, and customised offers. The results provide an initial insight into service attributes that influence consumer adoption of PN.

摘要

背景

个性化营养(PN)可能会给消费者带来重大健康益处。PN推广的一个潜在障碍是消费者不愿披露PN所基于的敏感信息。本研究采用隐私演算来探讨PN服务属性如何影响消费者对隐私风险和个性化益处的认知。

方法

在8个欧盟国家举行了16个焦点小组(n = 124),讨论了9种PN服务,这些服务在个人信息、沟通渠道、服务提供商、建议依据、范围、频率和客户锁定方面存在差异。对会议记录进行了内容分析。

结果

构成PN的个人信息既影响了隐私风险认知,也影响了个性化益处认知。面对面披露信息减轻了隐私风险认知,增强了个性化益处认知。由合格专家提供并以科学证据为依据的PN提高了参与者的价值认知。提高便利性、提供定期面对面支持以及采用客户锁定策略被认为是有益的。

结论

本研究表明,为鼓励消费者采用PN,必须考虑面对面沟通、专家建议提供者、支持、关注生活方式改变以及定制化服务。研究结果初步揭示了影响消费者采用PN的服务属性。

相似文献

1
Understanding consumer evaluations of personalised nutrition services in terms of the privacy calculus: a qualitative study.从隐私权衡角度理解消费者对个性化营养服务的评价:一项定性研究。
Public Health Genomics. 2014;17(3):127-40. doi: 10.1159/000358851. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
2
Consumer adoption of personalised nutrition services from the perspective of a risk-benefit trade-off.从风险-收益权衡的角度看消费者对个性化营养服务的采用。
Genes Nutr. 2015 Nov;10(6):42. doi: 10.1007/s12263-015-0478-y. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
3
Providing Personalised Nutrition: Consumers' Trust and Preferences Regarding Sources of Information, Service Providers and Regulators, and Communication Channels.提供个性化营养:消费者对信息来源、服务提供商、监管机构及沟通渠道的信任与偏好
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(4):218-228. doi: 10.1159/000481357. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
4
The perceived impact of the National Health Service on personalised nutrition service delivery among the UK public.国民医疗服务体系对英国公众个性化营养服务提供的感知影响。
Br J Nutr. 2015 Apr 28;113(8):1271-9. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515000045. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
5
Consumer Attitudes and Perceptions on mHealth Privacy and Security: Findings From a Mixed-Methods Study.消费者对移动健康隐私与安全的态度和认知:一项混合方法研究的结果
J Health Commun. 2015;20(6):673-9. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018560. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
6
Consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition: The role of ambivalent feelings and eating context.消费者对个性化营养的接受度:矛盾情感和饮食情境的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 13;15(4):e0231342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231342. eCollection 2020.
7
Willingness to pay for personalised nutrition across Europe.欧洲各地为个性化营养支付费用的意愿。
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Aug;26(4):640-4. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw045. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
8
Consumers' intention to use health recommendation systems to receive personalized nutrition advice.消费者使用健康推荐系统接受个性化营养建议的意愿。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 4;13:126. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-126.
9
Knowing your genes: does this impact behaviour change?了解你的基因:这会影响行为改变吗?
Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):182-191. doi: 10.1017/S0029665116002949. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Personalised Nutrition.消费者对个性化营养的偏好和支付意愿。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Sep;19(5):757-767. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00647-3. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Breeding by intervening: Exploring the role of associations and deliberation in consumer acceptance of different breeding techniques.干预式繁殖:探索关联和审议在消费者对不同繁殖技术接受度中的作用。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Oct;32(7):889-906. doi: 10.1177/09636625231168087. Epub 2023 May 9.
2
Design Issues in Personalized Nutrition Advice Systems.个性化营养咨询系统的设计问题。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 29;25:e37667. doi: 10.2196/37667.
3
HRQoL and nutritional well-being dissimilarities between two different online collection methods: Value for digital health implementation.
两种不同在线收集方法之间的健康相关生活质量和营养状况差异:对数字健康实施的价值
Digit Health. 2022 Nov 22;8:20552076221138316. doi: 10.1177/20552076221138316. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
The Impact of Both Individual and Contextual Factors on the Acceptance of Personalized Dietary Advice.个体因素和情境因素对个性化饮食建议接受度的影响。
Nutrients. 2022 Apr 29;14(9):1866. doi: 10.3390/nu14091866.
5
Short and Long-Term Innovations on Dietary Behavior Assessment and Coaching: Present Efforts and Vision of the Pride and Prejudice Consortium.饮食行为评估和辅导的短期和长期创新:Pride and Prejudice 联盟的现有努力和愿景。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 25;18(15):7877. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157877.
6
Consumer acceptance of genetic-based personalized nutrition in Hungary.匈牙利消费者对基于基因的个性化营养的接受度。
Genes Nutr. 2021 Mar 1;16(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12263-021-00683-7.
7
Insights Into the Delivery of Personalized Nutrition: Evidence From Face-To-Face and Web-Based Dietary Interventions.个性化营养供给的见解:来自面对面和基于网络的饮食干预的证据
Front Nutr. 2021 Jan 27;7:570531. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.570531. eCollection 2020.
8
Consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition: The role of ambivalent feelings and eating context.消费者对个性化营养的接受度:矛盾情感和饮食情境的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 13;15(4):e0231342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231342. eCollection 2020.
9
Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Nutrigenetics: Findings from the 2018 Unified Forces Preventive Nutrition Conference (UFPN).营养遗传学知识和态度:2018 年联合部队预防营养会议(UFPN)的研究结果。
Nutrients. 2020 Jan 27;12(2):335. doi: 10.3390/nu12020335.
10
Consumer adoption of personalised nutrition services from the perspective of a risk-benefit trade-off.从风险-收益权衡的角度看消费者对个性化营养服务的采用。
Genes Nutr. 2015 Nov;10(6):42. doi: 10.1007/s12263-015-0478-y. Epub 2015 Sep 25.