Suppr超能文献

爱丁堡抑郁量表作为帕金森病抑郁筛查工具的效用。

The utility of the Edinburgh Depression Scale as a screening tool for depression in Parkinson's disease.

作者信息

Baillon Sarah, Lindesay James, Prabhakaran Pravin, Hands Oli, Murray Jonathan, Stacey Suzanne, Gaur Sandhya, Rajkonwar Aniruddha, Padmanabhan Jayaraj, Shukla Deepak, Chakrabarti Santanu, Lo Nelson, Dennis Michael

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;29(12):1286-93. doi: 10.1002/gps.4110. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) as a screening tool for use in a Parkinson's disease (PD) population. Many commonly used depression scales include items relating to somatic symptoms that also occur in PD, which could potentially result in inaccurate reporting of depressive symptoms. The EDS is a scale that incorporates no somatic items.

METHOD

One hundred twenty patients attending specialist PD clinics were assessed using a standardised diagnostic interview (Present State Examination--Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry) to establish a diagnosis of DSM-IV depression. They later completed the EDS with another researcher who was blind to the results of diagnostic interview. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was carried out to identify the optimal threshold score on the EDS and the Brief EDS to identify any depressive disorder or major depression. The performance characteristics at a range of thresholds were compared.

RESULTS

A cut-off score of 10/11 gave maximal discriminant validity, with 74% sensitivity, 92% specificity and 64% positive predictive value for the identification of any depression according to DSM-IV criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the EDS is both a valid and potentially useful instrument that can be used as a quick self-completion questionnaire for screening for depression in people who have PD.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估爱丁堡抑郁量表(EDS)作为帕金森病(PD)人群筛查工具的有效性。许多常用的抑郁量表包含与PD中也会出现的躯体症状相关的条目,这可能会导致抑郁症状报告不准确。EDS是一个不包含躯体条目的量表。

方法

使用标准化诊断访谈(现况检查——神经精神病学临床评估日程表)对120名到专科PD诊所就诊的患者进行评估,以确定DSM-IV抑郁症的诊断。随后,他们与另一位对诊断访谈结果不知情的研究人员一起完成了EDS。进行了受试者工作特征曲线分析,以确定EDS和简易EDS上用于识别任何抑郁症或重度抑郁症的最佳阈值分数。比较了一系列阈值下的性能特征。

结果

根据DSM-IV标准,10/11的临界值具有最大判别效度,识别任何抑郁症的敏感性为74%,特异性为92%,阳性预测值为64%。

结论

本研究表明,EDS是一种有效且可能有用的工具,可作为一种快速自我完成问卷,用于筛查PD患者的抑郁症。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验