Schnall R, Liu N, Sperling J, Green R, Clark S, Vawdrey D
Columbia University, School of Nursing, Columbia University Medical Center , New York, NY, United States.
Columbia University, Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health , New York, NY, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Mar 26;5(1):299-312. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-09-RA-0075. eCollection 2014.
Based on US. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations, New York State enacted legislation in 2010 requiring healthcare providers to offer non-targeted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing to all patients aged 13-64. Three New York City adult emergency departments implemented an electronic alert that required clinicians to document whether an HIV test was offered before discharging a patient. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the electronic alert on HIV testing rates and diagnosis of HIV positive individuals.
During the pre-intervention period (2.5-4 months), an electronic "HIV Testing" order set was available for clinicians to order a test or document a reason for not offering the test (e.g., patient is not conscious). An electronic alert was then added to enforce completion of the order set, effectively preventing ED discharge until an HIV test was offered to the patient. We analyzed data from 79,786 visits, measuring HIV testing and detection rates during the pre-intervention period and during the six months following the implementation of the alert.
The percentage of visits where an HIV test was performed increased from 5.4% in the preintervention period to 8.7% (p<0.001) after the electronic alert. After the implementation of the electronic alert, there was a 61% increase in HIV tests performed per visit. However, the percentage of patients testing positive per total patients-tested was slightly lower in the post-intervention group than the pre-intervention group (0.48% vs. 0.55%), but this was not significant. The number of patients-testing positive per total-patient visit was higher in the post-intervention group (0.04% vs. 0.03%).
An electronic alert which enforced non-targeted screening was effective at increasing HIV testing rates but did not significantly increase the detection of persons living with HIV. The impact of this electronic alert on healthcare costs and quality of care merits further examination.
根据美国疾病控制与预防中心的建议,纽约州于2010年颁布立法,要求医疗服务提供者对所有13至64岁的患者进行非针对性的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)检测。纽约市的三家成人急诊科实施了一项电子警报,要求临床医生在患者出院前记录是否提供了HIV检测。本研究的目的是评估该电子警报对HIV检测率和HIV阳性个体诊断的影响。
在干预前期(2.5至4个月),临床医生可使用电子“HIV检测”医嘱集来开具检测医嘱或记录不进行检测的原因(例如,患者意识不清)。随后添加了电子警报以强制完成医嘱集,从而有效防止患者在未接受HIV检测的情况下从急诊科出院。我们分析了79786次就诊的数据,测量了干预前期以及警报实施后六个月内的HIV检测和检出率。
进行HIV检测的就诊百分比从干预前期的5.4%增加到电子警报实施后的8.7%(p<0.001)。电子警报实施后,每次就诊进行的HIV检测增加了61%。然而,干预后组中检测呈阳性的患者占总检测患者的百分比略低于干预前组(分别为0.48%和0.55%),但差异不显著。干预后组中每次就诊检测呈阳性的患者数量更高(分别为0.04%和0.03%)。
强制进行非针对性筛查的电子警报有效提高了HIV检测率,但并未显著增加HIV感染者的检出率。该电子警报对医疗成本和医疗质量的影响值得进一步研究。