• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能与机器人的责任:超越权利进行创新。

Artificial intelligence and robot responsibilities: innovating beyond rights.

作者信息

Ashrafian Hutan

机构信息

Imperial College London, 10th Floor QEQM-Building, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK,

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Apr;21(2):317-26. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9541-0. Epub 2014 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-014-9541-0
PMID:24737482
Abstract

The enduring innovations in artificial intelligence and robotics offer the promised capacity of computer consciousness, sentience and rationality. The development of these advanced technologies have been considered to merit rights, however these can only be ascribed in the context of commensurate responsibilities and duties. This represents the discernable next-step for evolution in this field. Addressing these needs requires attention to the philosophical perspectives of moral responsibility for artificial intelligence and robotics. A contrast to the moral status of animals may be considered. At a practical level, the attainment of responsibilities by artificial intelligence and robots can benefit from the established responsibilities and duties of human society, as their subsistence exists within this domain. These responsibilities can be further interpreted and crystalized through legal principles, many of which have been conserved from ancient Roman law. The ultimate and unified goal of stipulating these responsibilities resides through the advancement of mankind and the enduring preservation of the core tenets of humanity.

摘要

人工智能和机器人技术方面的持久创新带来了计算机意识、感知能力和理性的前景。这些先进技术的发展被认为值得赋予权利,然而,这些权利只能在相应的责任和义务背景下赋予。这代表了该领域可预见的下一步发展。满足这些需求需要关注人工智能和机器人技术道德责任的哲学观点。可以考虑与动物道德地位进行对比。在实践层面,人工智能和机器人履行责任可受益于人类社会既定的责任和义务,因为它们存在于这一领域。这些责任可通过法律原则进一步阐释和明确,其中许多源自古罗马法。规定这些责任的最终统一目标是推动人类进步和持久维护人性的核心原则。

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence and robot responsibilities: innovating beyond rights.人工智能与机器人的责任:超越权利进行创新。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Apr;21(2):317-26. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9541-0. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
2
AIonAI: a humanitarian law of artificial intelligence and robotics.人工智能与机器人技术的人道法
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Feb;21(1):29-40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9513-9. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
3
Eight Kinds of Critters: A Moral Taxonomy for the Twenty-Second Century.《八种生物:22世纪的道德分类法》
J Med Philos. 2018 Sep 5;43(5):585-612. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhy018.
4
Can Artificial Intelligences Suffer from Mental Illness? A Philosophical Matter to Consider.人工智能会患精神疾病吗?一个值得思考的哲学问题。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Apr;23(2):403-412. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9783-0. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
5
Moral Status for Malware! The Difficulty of Defining Advanced Artificial Intelligence.恶意软件的道德地位!定义高级人工智能的困难。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2021 Jul;30(3):517-528. doi: 10.1017/S0963180120001061.
6
How Could We Know When a Robot was a Moral Patient?当机器人成为道德病人时,我们如何知道?
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2021 Jul;30(3):459-471. doi: 10.1017/S0963180120001012.
7
Intelligent robots must uphold human rights.智能机器人必须维护人权。
Nature. 2015 Mar 26;519(7544):391. doi: 10.1038/519391a.
8
[Artificial intelligence, philosophical reflection].[人工智能,哲学思考]
Soins. 2019 Jul-Aug;64(837):24-27. doi: 10.1016/j.soin.2019.05.002.
9
Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents.批判制造人工道德代理的原因。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):719-735. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0030-8. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
10
Self-driving car dilemmas reveal that moral choices are not universal.自动驾驶汽车的困境表明,道德选择并非普遍适用。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):469-470. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07135-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Current status, challenges, and prospects of artificial intelligence applications in wound repair theranostics.人工智能在伤口修复诊疗中的应用现状、挑战与前景
Theranostics. 2025 Jan 2;15(5):1662-1688. doi: 10.7150/thno.105109. eCollection 2025.
2
The Moral Consideration of Artificial Entities: A Literature Review.人工实体的道德考量:文献综述。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Aug 9;27(4):53. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00331-8.
3
Artificial Moral Agents: A Survey of the Current Status.人工道德代理:现状调查。

本文引用的文献

1
A novel modification of the Turing test for artificial intelligence and robotics in healthcare.一种用于医疗保健领域人工智能和机器人技术的图灵测试的新颖改进。
Int J Med Robot. 2015 Mar;11(1):38-43. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1570. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
2
AIonAI: a humanitarian law of artificial intelligence and robotics.人工智能与机器人技术的人道法
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Feb;21(1):29-40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9513-9. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):501-532. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00151-x. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
Can Artificial Intelligences Suffer from Mental Illness? A Philosophical Matter to Consider.人工智能会患精神疾病吗?一个值得思考的哲学问题。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Apr;23(2):403-412. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9783-0. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
5
3D in vitro modeling of the central nervous system.中枢神经系统的3D体外建模。
Prog Neurobiol. 2015 Feb;125:1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 22.