Singh Hardeep, Meyer Ashley N D, Thomas Eric J
Houston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Texas at Houston, Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Sep;23(9):727-31. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002627. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
The frequency of outpatient diagnostic errors is challenging to determine due to varying error definitions and the need to review data across multiple providers and care settings over time. We estimated the frequency of diagnostic errors in the US adult population by synthesising data from three previous studies of clinic-based populations that used conceptually similar definitions of diagnostic error.
Data sources included two previous studies that used electronic triggers, or algorithms, to detect unusual patterns of return visits after an initial primary care visit or lack of follow-up of abnormal clinical findings related to colorectal cancer, both suggestive of diagnostic errors. A third study examined consecutive cases of lung cancer. In all three studies, diagnostic errors were confirmed through chart review and defined as missed opportunities to make a timely or correct diagnosis based on available evidence. We extrapolated the frequency of diagnostic error obtained from our studies to the US adult population, using the primary care study to estimate rates of diagnostic error for acute conditions (and exacerbations of existing conditions) and the two cancer studies to conservatively estimate rates of missed diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancer (as proxies for other serious chronic conditions).
Combining estimates from the three studies yielded a rate of outpatient diagnostic errors of 5.08%, or approximately 12 million US adults every year. Based upon previous work, we estimate that about half of these errors could potentially be harmful.
Our population-based estimate suggests that diagnostic errors affect at least 1 in 20 US adults. This foundational evidence should encourage policymakers, healthcare organisations and researchers to start measuring and reducing diagnostic errors.
由于错误定义不同,且需要长期审查多个医疗机构和护理环境中的数据,因此难以确定门诊诊断错误的发生率。我们通过综合此前三项针对以诊所为基础人群的研究数据,估算了美国成年人群体中诊断错误的发生率,这三项研究对诊断错误采用了概念上相似的定义。
数据来源包括此前两项研究,这两项研究使用电子触发器或算法来检测初次基层医疗就诊后的复诊异常模式,或与结直肠癌相关的异常临床检查结果缺乏后续跟进情况,这两种情况均提示存在诊断错误。第三项研究考察了肺癌连续病例。在所有三项研究中,诊断错误均通过病历审查得以确认,并被定义为基于现有证据未能及时或正确做出诊断的情况。我们将研究得出的诊断错误发生率推算至美国成年人群体,利用基层医疗研究估算急性病症(以及现有病症的加重情况)的诊断错误率,利用两项癌症研究保守估算结直肠癌和肺癌的漏诊率(作为其他严重慢性病的代表)。
综合三项研究的估算结果得出门诊诊断错误率为5.08%,即每年约有1200万美国成年人。根据此前的研究,我们估计这些错误中约有一半可能具有危害性。
我们基于人群的估算表明,诊断错误影响至少二十分之一的美国成年人。这一基础证据应促使政策制定者、医疗保健机构和研究人员开始衡量并减少诊断错误。