van den Bosch I, Dalenberg J R, Renken R, van Langeveld A W B, Smeets P A M, Griffioen-Roose S, Ter Horst G J, de Graaf C, Boesveldt S
TI Food and Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands; Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands.
TI Food and Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands; Department of Neuroscience, Neuroimaging Centre (BCN-NiC), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands.
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Aug 1;269:128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
Flavor preferences vary; what one enjoys may be disgusting to another. Previous research has indicated several brain regions associated with flavor preferences. However, by using different stimuli or different internal states to obtain differences in liking, results of these studies may be confounded. Therefore, we used one target stimulus (grapefruit juice) and fMRI to compare brain activation patterns between participants that either liked (n=16) or disliked (n=18) this stimulus. Our first aim was to investigate whether differential neural activation exists that accounts for the difference in subjective flavor preference for the target stimulus. Secondly, multivariate analysis was used to investigate whether differences in subjective liking for the target revealed similar activation patterns as differences in general liking for a sweet and bitter solution. A direct comparison of likers and dislikers of the target stimulus revealed only small differences in activations in orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). However, when using multivariate analysis, a broader activation pattern (including OFC, dACC, pregenual anterior cingulate, anterior insula and ventral striatum) was identified that discriminated likers from dislikers with an 88% success rate. Interestingly though, little overlap was found between this pattern and the pattern that discriminates liking for the sweet and bitter solutions and lesser voxels contributed to the former compared with the latter. These differences between patterns discerning innate versus learned preferences may suggest that different mechanisms are at work and highlight the importance of elucidating the neural processes of how subjective preferences are learned and acquired.
口味偏好因人而异;一个人喜欢的东西可能会让另一个人觉得恶心。先前的研究已经指出了几个与口味偏好相关的脑区。然而,通过使用不同的刺激或不同的内部状态来获得喜好上的差异,这些研究的结果可能会受到混淆。因此,我们使用一种目标刺激物(葡萄柚汁)和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来比较喜欢(n = 16)或不喜欢(n = 18)这种刺激物的参与者之间的脑激活模式。我们的首要目标是研究是否存在差异神经激活来解释对目标刺激物主观口味偏好的差异。其次,使用多变量分析来研究对目标的主观喜好差异是否揭示出与对甜味和苦味溶液的总体喜好差异相似的激活模式。对目标刺激物的喜欢者和不喜欢者的直接比较仅发现眶额皮质(OFC)和背侧前扣带回皮质(dACC)的激活存在微小差异。然而,当使用多变量分析时,识别出了一种更广泛的激活模式(包括OFC、dACC、膝前扣带回、前脑岛和腹侧纹状体),该模式以88%的成功率区分了喜欢者和不喜欢者。不过,有趣的是,在这种模式与区分对甜味和苦味溶液喜好的模式之间几乎没有重叠,并且与后者相比,对前者有贡献的体素更少。区分先天偏好与后天习得偏好的这些模式差异可能表明不同的机制在起作用,并突出了阐明主观偏好是如何学习和获得的神经过程的重要性。