Abla Adib A, Lawton Michael T
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1364-77. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS132219. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
The authors describe their experience with intracranial-to-intracranial (IC-IC) bypasses for complex anterior cerebral artery (ACA) aneurysms with giant size, dolichoectatic morphology, or intraluminal thrombus; they determine how others have addressed the limitations of ACA bypass; and they discuss clinical indications and microsurgical technique.
A consecutive, single-surgeon experience with ACA aneurysms and bypasses over a 16-year period was retrospectively reviewed. Bypasses for ACA aneurysms reported in the literature were also reviewed.
Ten patients had aneurysms that were treated with ACA bypass as part of their surgical intervention. Four patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage and 3 patients with mass effect symptoms from giant aneurysms; 1 patient with bacterial endocarditis had a mycotic aneurysm, and 1 patient's meningioma resection was complicated by an iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm. One patient had his aneurysm discovered incidentally. There were 2 precommunicating aneurysms (A1 segment of the ACA), 5 communicating aneurysms (ACoA), and 3 postcommunicating (A2-A3 segments of the ACA). In situ bypasses were used in 4 patients (A3-A3 bypass), interposition bypasses in 4 patients, reimplantation in 1 patient (pericallosal artery-to-callosomarginal artery), and reanastomosis in 1 patient (pericallosal artery). Complete aneurysm obliteration was demonstrated in 8 patients, and bypass patency was demonstrated in 8 patients. One bypass thrombosed, but 4 years later. There were no operative deaths, and permanent neurological morbidity was observed in 2 patients. At last follow-up, 8 patients (80%) were improved or unchanged. In a review of the 29 relevant reports, the A3-A3 in situ bypass was used most commonly, extracranial (EC)-IC interpositional bypasses were the second most common, and reanastomosis and reimplantation were used the least.
Anterior cerebral artery aneurysms requiring bypass are rare and can be revascularized in a variety of ways. Anterior cerebral artery aneurysms, more than any other aneurysms, require a thorough survey of patient-specific anatomy and microsurgical options before deciding on an individualized management strategy. The authors' experience demonstrates a preference for IC-IC reconstruction, but EC-IC bypasses are reported frequently in the literature. The authors conclude that ACA bypass with indirect aneurysm occlusion is a good alternative to direct clip reconstruction for complex ACA aneurysms.
作者描述了他们使用颅内-颅内(IC-IC)搭桥术治疗复杂的大脑前动脉(ACA)动脉瘤的经验,这些动脉瘤具有巨大尺寸、长段扩张形态或腔内血栓;他们确定了其他人如何解决ACA搭桥的局限性;并讨论了临床适应症和显微手术技术。
回顾性分析了一位外科医生在16年期间连续进行的ACA动脉瘤及搭桥手术的经验。同时也回顾了文献中报道的ACA动脉瘤搭桥手术。
10例患者的动脉瘤在手术干预中接受了ACA搭桥治疗。4例患者表现为蛛网膜下腔出血,3例患者因巨大动脉瘤出现占位效应症状;1例患有细菌性心内膜炎的患者有真菌性动脉瘤,1例患者在脑膜瘤切除术后并发医源性假性动脉瘤。1例患者的动脉瘤为偶然发现。有2例前交通动脉瘤(ACA的A1段),5例交通动脉瘤(ACoA),3例后交通动脉瘤(ACA的A2 - A3段)。4例患者采用原位搭桥(A3 - A3搭桥),4例患者采用间置搭桥,1例患者采用再植入(胼周动脉至胼缘动脉),1例患者采用重新吻合(胼周动脉)。8例患者的动脉瘤完全闭塞,8例患者的搭桥血管通畅。1例搭桥血管血栓形成,但在4年后。无手术死亡病例,2例患者出现永久性神经功能障碍。在最后一次随访时,8例患者(80%)病情改善或无变化。在对29篇相关报告的回顾中,最常使用的是A3 - A3原位搭桥,其次是颅外(EC)-IC间置搭桥,重新吻合和再植入使用最少。
需要搭桥治疗的大脑前动脉动脉瘤很少见,可以通过多种方式进行血管重建。与其他任何动脉瘤相比,大脑前动脉动脉瘤在决定个体化治疗策略之前,需要对患者特定的解剖结构和显微手术选择进行全面评估。作者的经验表明倾向于IC-IC重建,但文献中经常报道EC-IC搭桥。作者得出结论,对于复杂ACA动脉瘤,采用间接动脉瘤闭塞的ACA搭桥是直接夹闭重建的良好替代方案。