Fiorina Claudia, Maffeo Diego, Curello Salvatore, Lipartiti Felicia, Chizzola Giuliano, D'Aloia Antonio, Adamo Marianna, Mastropierro Rosy, Gavazzi Emanuele, Ciccarese Camilla, Chiari Ermanna, Ettori Federica
Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Cardiothoracic Department, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Cardiothoracic Department, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2014 Jun;15(4):200-3. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
Balloon valvuloplasty has been considered a mandatory step of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), although it is not without risk. The aim of this work was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of TAVI performed without pre-dilation (direct TAVI) of the stenosed aortic valve.
Between June 2012 and June 2013, 55 consecutive TAVI performed without pre-dilation at our institution using the self-expandable CoreValve prosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) were analyzed and compared with 45 pre-dilated TAVI performed the previous year. Inclusion criteria were a symptomatic and severe aortic stenosis. Exclusion criteria were defined as presence of pure aortic regurgitation, degenerated surgical bioprosthesis or bicuspid aortic valve and prior procedure of balloon aortic valvuloplasty performed as a bridge to TAVI.
High-burden calcification in the device landing zone, assessed by CT scan, was found in most of the patients. The valve size implanted was similar in both groups. Device success was higher in direct TAVI (85%vs.64%,p=0.014), mostly driven by a significant lower incidence of paravalvular leak (PVL≥2;9%vs.33%,p=0.02). Safety combined end point at 30 days was similar in both groups.
Compared to TAVI with pre-dilation, direct TAVI is feasible regardless of the presence of bulky calcified aortic valve and the valve size implanted. Device success was higher in direct TAVI, mostly driven by a lower incidence of paravalvular leak. Safety at 30 days was similar in two groups.
球囊瓣膜成形术一直被认为是经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的必要步骤,尽管并非没有风险。本研究的目的是评估在不预先扩张狭窄主动脉瓣(直接TAVI)的情况下进行TAVI的可行性和安全性。
2012年6月至2013年6月期间,对在我院连续55例使用自膨胀CoreValve假体(美敦力公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)进行的未预先扩张的TAVI进行了分析,并与上一年进行的45例预先扩张的TAVI进行了比较。纳入标准为有症状的重度主动脉瓣狭窄。排除标准定义为存在单纯主动脉瓣反流、退化的外科生物瓣膜或二叶式主动脉瓣,以及先前作为TAVI桥梁进行的球囊主动脉瓣成形术。
通过CT扫描评估,大多数患者的器械着陆区存在高负荷钙化。两组植入的瓣膜尺寸相似。直接TAVI的器械成功率更高(85%对64%,p = 0.014),主要是由于瓣周漏(PVL≥2)的发生率显著降低(9%对33%,p = 0.02)。两组30天的安全综合终点相似。
与预先扩张的TAVI相比,无论是否存在巨大钙化的主动脉瓣以及植入的瓣膜尺寸如何,直接TAVI都是可行的。直接TAVI的器械成功率更高,主要是由于瓣周漏的发生率较低。两组30天的安全性相似。