Nolen Brian M, Brand Randall E, Prosser Denise, Velikokhatnaya Liudmila, Allen Peter J, Zeh Herbert J, Grizzle William E, Huang Ying, Lomakin Aleksey, Lokshin Anna E
University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 18;9(4):e94928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094928. eCollection 2014.
The clinical management of pancreatic cancer is severely hampered by the absence of effective screening tools.
Sixty-seven biomarkers were evaluated in prediagnostic sera obtained from cases of pancreatic cancer enrolled in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO).
The panel of CA 19-9, OPN, and OPG, identified in a prior retrospective study, was not effective. CA 19-9, CEA, NSE, bHCG, CEACAM1 and PRL were significantly altered in sera obtained from cases greater than 1 year prior to diagnosis. Levels of CA 19-9, CA 125, CEA, PRL, and IL-8 were negatively associated with time to diagnosis. A training/validation study using alternate halves of the PLCO set failed to identify a biomarker panel with significantly improved performance over CA 19-9 alone. When the entire PLCO set was used for training at a specificity (SP) of 95%, a panel of CA 19-9, CEA, and Cyfra 21-1 provided significantly elevated sensitivity (SN) levels of 32.4% and 29.7% in samples collected <1 and >1 year prior to diagnosis, respectively, compared to SN levels of 25.7% and 17.2% for CA 19-9 alone.
Most biomarkers identified in previously conducted case/control studies are ineffective in prediagnostic samples, however several biomarkers were identified as significantly altered up to 35 months prior to diagnosis. Two newly derived biomarker combinations offered advantage over CA 19-9 alone in terms of SN, particularly in samples collected >1 year prior to diagnosis. However, the efficacy of biomarker-based tools remains limited at present. Several biomarkers demonstrated significant velocity related to time to diagnosis, an observation which may offer considerable potential for enhancements in early detection.
缺乏有效的筛查工具严重阻碍了胰腺癌的临床管理。
对参加前列腺、肺、结直肠癌和卵巢癌筛查试验(PLCO)的胰腺癌患者诊断前血清中的67种生物标志物进行了评估。
先前一项回顾性研究中确定的CA 19-9、骨桥蛋白(OPN)和骨保护素(OPG)组合无效。在诊断前1年以上的患者血清中,CA 19-9、癌胚抗原(CEA)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(bHCG)、癌胚抗原相关细胞黏附分子1(CEACAM1)和催乳素(PRL)有显著变化。CA 19-9、CA 125、CEA、PRL和白细胞介素-8(IL-8)的水平与诊断时间呈负相关。使用PLCO数据集的交替两半进行的训练/验证研究未能确定一个性能明显优于单独使用CA 19-9的生物标志物组合。当以95%的特异性(SP)使用整个PLCO数据集进行训练时,CA 19-9、CEA和细胞角蛋白19片段(Cyfra 21-1)组合在诊断前<1年和>1年采集的样本中分别提供了显著提高的灵敏度(SN)水平,分别为32.4%和29.7%,而单独使用CA 19-9时的SN水平分别为25.7%和17.2%。
先前进行的病例/对照研究中确定的大多数生物标志物在诊断前样本中无效,然而,有几种生物标志物在诊断前35个月就被确定有显著变化。两种新推导的生物标志物组合在SN方面比单独使用CA 19-9更具优势,特别是在诊断前>1年采集的样本中。然而,目前基于生物标志物的工具的疗效仍然有限。几种生物标志物显示出与诊断时间相关的显著变化速度,这一观察结果可能为早期检测的改进提供相当大的潜力。