• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经芯针活检诊断的放射状瘢痕手术切除可能有助于预测未来患乳腺癌的风险。

Surgical excision of radial scars diagnosed by core biopsy may help predict future risk of breast cancer.

作者信息

Miller Cynthia L, West Jane A, Bettini Anna C, Koerner Frederick C, Gudewicz Thomas M, Freer Phoebe E, Coopey Suzanne B, Gadd Michele A, Hughes Kevin S, Smith Barbara L, Rafferty Elizabeth, Specht Michelle C

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jun;145(2):331-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2958-y. Epub 2014 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-014-2958-y
PMID:24748568
Abstract

Radial scars (RS's) are benign breast lesions known to be associated with carcinomas and other high-risk lesions (HRL's). The upgrade rate to carcinoma after core biopsy revealing RS is 0-40 %. We sought to determine the outcomes of RS with and without HRL diagnosed by core biopsy. Patients who underwent core biopsy revealing RS without carcinoma at our institution between 1/1996 and 11/2012 were identified from a surgical pathology database. Retrospective chart review was utilized to classify patients as RS-no HRL or RS-HRL. HRL was defined as ADH, LCIS, and/or ALH. We determined upgrade rate to carcinoma at surgical excision, and upgrade to HRL for RS-no HRL patients. Univariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for upgrade in RS-no HRL patients. 156 patients underwent core biopsy revealing RS, 131 RS-no HRL (84 %), and 25 RS-HRL (16 %). The overall rate of upgrade to invasive carcinoma was 0.8 % (1/124). 1.0 % (1/102) of RS-no HRL and 13.6 % (3/22) of RS-HRL patients were upgraded to DCIS (P = 0.0023). The upgrade of RS-no HRL to HRL at excision was 21.6 % (22/102). By univariate analysis, RS-no HRL with radiologic appearance of a mass/architectural distortion had a significantly higher rate of upgrade to HRL or carcinoma compared with calcifications (P = 0.03). Excision of RS to rule out associated invasive carcinoma is not warranted, given a <1 % rate of upgrade at excision. However, excision to evaluate for non-invasive cancer or HRL may be considered to help guide clinical decision-making about use of chemoprevention.

摘要

放射状瘢痕(RS)是已知与癌及其他高危病变(HRL)相关的乳腺良性病变。在粗针活检发现RS后升级为癌的比例为0%至40%。我们试图确定经粗针活检诊断为有或无HRL的RS的转归情况。从手术病理数据库中识别出1996年1月至2012年11月期间在我们机构经粗针活检发现无癌的RS患者。通过回顾病历将患者分类为无HRL的RS或有HRL的RS。HRL定义为非典型导管增生(ADH)、小叶原位癌(LCIS)和/或小叶腺病(ALH)。我们确定了手术切除时升级为癌的比例,以及无HRL的RS患者升级为HRL的比例。进行单因素分析以确定无HRL的RS患者升级的危险因素。156例患者经粗针活检发现RS,其中131例为无HRL的RS(84%),25例为有HRL的RS(16%)。升级为浸润性癌的总体比例为0.8%(1/124)。无HRL的RS患者中有1.0%(1/102)升级为导管原位癌(DCIS),有HRL的RS患者中有13.6%(3/22)升级为DCIS(P = 0.0023)。无HRL的RS在切除时升级为HRL的比例为21.6%(22/102)。单因素分析显示,与钙化表现相比,具有肿块/结构扭曲放射学表现的无HRL的RS升级为HRL或癌的比例显著更高(P = 0.03)。鉴于切除时升级比例<1%,因此没有必要切除RS以排除相关浸润性癌。然而,为评估非浸润性癌或HRL而进行切除可有助于指导关于化学预防使用的临床决策。

相似文献

1
Surgical excision of radial scars diagnosed by core biopsy may help predict future risk of breast cancer.经芯针活检诊断的放射状瘢痕手术切除可能有助于预测未来患乳腺癌的风险。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jun;145(2):331-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2958-y. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
2
Rationale of excisional biopsy after the diagnosis of benign radial scar on core biopsy: a single institutional outcome analysis.核心活检诊断为良性放射状瘢痕后行切除术活检的理由:单机构结果分析。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb;36(1):7-11. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3182354a3f.
3
Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?影像引导下乳腺活检中的放射状瘢痕:是否需要手术切除?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;170(2):313-320. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4741-y. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
4
Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary?粗针活检发现小叶原位癌或非典型小叶增生:是否需要切除活检?
Radiology. 2004 Jun;231(3):813-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2313030874. Epub 2004 Apr 22.
5
Correlation between core biopsy and excisional biopsy in breast high-risk lesions.乳腺高危病变中粗针活检与切除活检的相关性
Am J Surg. 2006 Oct;192(4):534-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.003.
6
Outcome of radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion associated with epithelial proliferations with atypia diagnosed on breast core biopsy: results from a multicentric UK-based study.乳腺核心活检中诊断的伴有非典型上皮增生的放射状瘢痕/复杂硬化性病变的转归:一项基于英国的多中心研究结果。
J Clin Pathol. 2019 Dec;72(12):800-804. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2019-205764. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
7
Management of radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast diagnosed on vacuum-assisted large-core biopsy: is surgery always necessary?在真空辅助大芯活检诊断的乳腺放射状瘢痕/复杂硬化性病变的处理:是否总是需要手术?
Histopathology. 2019 Dec;75(6):900-915. doi: 10.1111/his.13950. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
8
Radiologic and Pathologic Features Associated With Upgrade of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at Surgical Excision.在外科切除时,与非典型导管增生升级相关的放射学和病理学特征。
Acad Radiol. 2019 Jul;26(7):893-899. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
9
Advocating Nonsurgical Management of Patients With Small, Incidental Radial Scars at the Time of Needle Core Biopsy: A Study of 77 Cases.提倡在粗针活检时对偶然发现的小桡侧瘢痕患者进行非手术治疗:一项77例病例的研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Sep;139(9):1137-42. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0550-OA. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
10
High-risk lesions in the breast diagnosed by MRI-guided core biopsy: upgrade rates and features associated with malignancy.乳腺 MRI 引导下核心活检诊断的高危病变:升级率及与恶性肿瘤相关的特征。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Dec;196(3):517-525. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06761-7. Epub 2022 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of delay of excisional biopsy on upstage rate for atypical ductal hyperplasia, flat epithelial atypia, intraductal papilloma, and radial scar.延迟切除术对非典型导管增生、平坦上皮不典型增生、导管内乳头状瘤和放射状瘢痕的升级率的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Dec;196(3):527-534. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06745-7. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
2
Radial Scar: a management dilemma.放射状瘢痕:一个管理难题。
Radiol Med. 2021 Jun;126(6):774-785. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01344-w. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
3
Second International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions).
第二届乳腺交界性病变(B3 病变)国际专家共识会议。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(2):279-296. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-05071-1. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
4
Radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast: radiologic and clinicopathologic correlation.乳腺放射状瘢痕/复杂性硬化性病变:影像学与临床病理对照研究
BMC Med Imaging. 2018 Nov 3;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12880-018-0279-z.
5
Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?影像引导下乳腺活检中的放射状瘢痕:是否需要手术切除?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;170(2):313-320. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4741-y. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
6
Pathologic High-risk Lesions, Diagnosis and Management.病理性高危病变:诊断与管理
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;59(4):727-732. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000234.
7
Upgrade rates of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy: a single-institution experience and literature review.在粗针活检中诊断出的高危乳腺病变的升级率:单机构经验及文献综述
Mod Pathol. 2016 Dec;29(12):1471-1484. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.127. Epub 2016 Aug 19.