George A.C. Murrell, MBBS, DPhil, Orthopaedic Research Institute, St George Hospital Campus, University of New South Wales, 4-10 South Street, Level 2, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia.
Am J Sports Med. 2014 May;42(5):1134-42. doi: 10.1177/0363546514525336. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
The rate of retears after rotator cuff repair varies from 11% to 94%. A retear is associated with poorer subjective and objective clinical outcomes than intact repair.
This study was designed to determine which preoperative and/or intraoperative factors held the greatest association with retears after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
This study retrospectively evaluated 1000 consecutive patients who had undergone a primary rotator cuff repair by a single surgeon using an arthroscopic inverted-mattress knotless technique and who had undergone an ultrasound evaluation 6 months after surgery to assess repair integrity. Exclusion criteria included previous rotator cuff repair on the same shoulder, incomplete repair, and repair using a synthetic polytetrafluoroethylene patch. All patients had completed the modified L'Insalata Questionnaire and underwent a clinical examination before surgery. Measurements of tear size, tear thickness, associated shoulder injury, tissue quality, and tendon mobility were recorded intraoperatively.
The overall retear rate at 6 months after surgery was 17%. Retears occurred in 27% of full-thickness tears and 5% of partial-thickness tears (P < .0001). The best independent predictors of retears were anteroposterior tear length (correlation coefficient r = 0.41, P < .0001), tear size area (r = 0.40, P < .0001), mediolateral tear length (r = 0.34, P < .0001), tear thickness (r = 0.29, P < .0001), age at surgery (r = 0.27, P < .0001), and operative time (r = 0.18, P < .0001). These factors produced a predictive model for retears: logit P = (0.039 × age at surgery in years) + (0.027 × tear thickness in %) + (1 × anteroposterior tear length in cm) + (0.76 × mediolateral tear length in cm) - (0.17 × tear size area in cm(2)) + (0.018 × operative time in minutes) -9.7. Logit P can be transformed into P, which is the chance of retears at 6 months after surgery.
A rotator cuff retear is a multifactorial process with no single preoperative or intraoperative factor being overwhelmingly predictive of it. Nevertheless, rotator cuff tear size (tear dimensions, tear size area, and tear thickness) showed stronger associations with retears at 6 months after surgery than did measures of tissue quality and concomitant shoulder injuries.
肩袖修补术后再撕裂的发生率为 11%~94%。与完整修复相比,再撕裂与较差的主观和客观临床结果相关。
本研究旨在确定关节镜肩袖修复术后再撕裂与哪些术前和/或术中因素关系最密切。
队列研究;证据等级,3 级。
本研究回顾性评估了 1000 例连续接受同一术者采用关节镜下倒“M”形无结缝线技术行初次肩袖修复的患者,所有患者均在术后 6 个月行超声检查评估修复完整性。排除标准包括同侧肩袖既往修补、修补不完整和使用合成聚四氟乙烯补片修补。所有患者在术前均完成改良 L'Insalata 问卷并接受临床检查。术中记录撕裂大小、撕裂厚度、相关肩损伤、组织质量和肌腱活动度等测量值。
术后 6 个月总体再撕裂率为 17%。全层撕裂再撕裂率为 27%,部分层撕裂再撕裂率为 5%(P<0.0001)。再撕裂的最佳独立预测因素是前后向撕裂长度(相关系数 r=0.41,P<0.0001)、撕裂大小面积(r=0.40,P<0.0001)、中外侧撕裂长度(r=0.34,P<0.0001)、撕裂厚度(r=0.29,P<0.0001)、手术时年龄(r=0.27,P<0.0001)和手术时间(r=0.18,P<0.0001)。这些因素产生了一个再撕裂的预测模型:logit P=(0.039×手术时年龄(岁))+(0.027×撕裂厚度(%))+(1×前后向撕裂长度(cm))+(0.76×中外侧撕裂长度(cm))-(0.17×撕裂大小面积(cm2))+(0.018×手术时间(min))-9.7。logit P 可转换为 P,即术后 6 个月再撕裂的概率。
肩袖再撕裂是一个多因素过程,没有单一的术前或术中因素具有压倒性的预测作用。然而,与组织质量和伴随的肩损伤测量值相比,肩袖撕裂大小(撕裂尺寸、撕裂大小面积和撕裂厚度)与术后 6 个月的再撕裂有更强的关联。