Bodner G, Scholl P, Loiskandl W, Kaul H-P
Department of Crop Sciences, Division of Agronomy, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, BOKU Vienna, Gregor Mendel Straße 33, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.
Department of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, Institute of Hydraulics and Rural Water Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, BOKU Vienna, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.
Geoderma. 2013 Aug;204-205(100):120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.04.015.
Structural porosity is a decisive property for soil productivity and soil environmental functions. Hydraulic properties in the structural range vary over time in response to management and environmental influences. Although this is widely recognized, there are few field studies that determine dominant driving forces underlying hydraulic property dynamics. During a three year field experiment we measured temporal variability of soil hydraulic properties by tension infiltrometry. Soil properties were characterized by hydraulic conductivity, effective macroporosity and Kosugi's lognormal pore size distribution model. Management related influences comprised three soil cover treatment (mustard and rye vs. fallow) and an initial mechanical soil disturbance with a rotary harrow. Environmental driving forces were derived from meteorological and soil moisture data. Soil hydraulic parameters varied over time by around one order of magnitude. The coefficient of variation of soil hydraulic conductivity K(h) decreased from 69.5% at saturation to 42.1% in the more unsaturated range (- 10 cm pressure head). A slight increase in the Kosugi parameter showing pore heterogeneity was observed under the rye cover crop, reflecting an enhanced structural porosity. The other hydraulic parameters were not significantly influenced by the soil cover treatments. Seedbed preparation with a rotary harrow resulted in a fourfold increase in macroporosity and hydraulic conductivity next to saturation, and homogenized the pore radius distribution. Re-consolidation after mechanical loosening lasted over 18 months until the soil returned to its initial state. The post-tillage trend of soil settlement could be approximated by an exponential decay function. Among environmental factors, wetting-drying cycles were identified as dominant driving force explaining short term hydraulic property changes within the season (r = 0.43 to 0.59). Our results suggested that beside considering average management induced changes in soil properties (e.g. cover crop introduction), a dynamic approach to hydrological modeling is required to capture over-seasonal (tillage driven) and short term (environmental driven) variability in hydraulic parameters.
结构孔隙度是影响土壤生产力和土壤环境功能的决定性因素。结构范围内的水力特性会随时间变化,以响应管理措施和环境影响。尽管这一点已得到广泛认可,但很少有实地研究确定水力特性动态变化的主要驱动力。在一项为期三年的田间试验中,我们通过张力入渗仪测量了土壤水力特性的时间变异性。土壤特性通过水力传导率、有效大孔隙度和小杉对数正态孔径分布模型来表征。与管理相关的影响包括三种土壤覆盖处理(芥菜和黑麦与休耕)以及用旋转耙进行的初始机械土壤扰动。环境驱动力来自气象和土壤湿度数据。土壤水力参数随时间变化约一个数量级。土壤水力传导率K(h)的变异系数从饱和时的69.5%降至更不饱和范围(-10厘米水头)时的42.1%。在黑麦覆盖作物下观察到小杉参数略有增加,表明孔隙异质性增强,这反映了结构孔隙度的提高。其他水力参数未受土壤覆盖处理的显著影响。用旋转耙整地导致大孔隙度和饱和附近的水力传导率增加了四倍,并使孔径分布均匀化。机械松土后的再固结持续了18个月以上,直到土壤恢复到初始状态。耕作后土壤沉降趋势可用指数衰减函数近似。在环境因素中,干湿循环被确定为解释季节内短期水力特性变化的主要驱动力(r = 0.43至0.59)。我们的结果表明,除了考虑管理措施引起的土壤特性平均变化(例如引入覆盖作物)外,还需要采用动态方法进行水文建模,以捕捉水力参数的季节性(耕作驱动)和短期(环境驱动)变异性。