Suppr超能文献

确定在门诊临床护理点使用的共享决策辅助工具的设计考量因素:一项针对市中心一家诊所的人种志研究。

Identifying design considerations for a shared decision aid for use at the point of outpatient clinical care: An ethnographic study at an inner city clinic.

作者信息

Hajizadeh Negin, Perez Figueroa Rafael E, Uhler Lauren M, Chiou Erin, Perchonok Jennifer E, Montague Enid

机构信息

Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.

The Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York University, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Particip Med. 2013 Mar 6;5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Computerized decision aids could facilitate shared decision-making at the point of outpatient clinical care. The objective of this study was to investigate whether a computerized shared decision aid would be feasible to implement in an inner-city clinic by evaluating the current practices in shared decision-making, clinicians' use of computers, patient and clinicians' attitudes and beliefs toward computerized decision aids, and the influence of time on shared decision-making.

METHODS

Qualitative data analysis of observations and semi-structured interviews with patients and clinicians at an inner-city outpatient clinic.

FINDINGS

The findings provided an exploratory look at the prevalence of shared decision-making and attitudes about health information technology and decision aids. A prominent barrier to clinicians engaging in shared decision-making was a lack of perceived patient understanding of medical information. Some patients preferred their clinicians make recommendations for them rather than engage in formal shared decision-making. Health information technology was an integral part of the clinic visit and welcomed by most clinicians and patients. Some patients expressed the desire to engage with health information technology such as viewing their medical information on the computer screen with their clinicians. All participants were receptive to the idea of a decision aid integrated within the clinic visit although some clinicians were concerned about the accuracy of prognostic estimates for complex medical problems.

IMPLICATIONS

We identified several important considerations for the design and implementation of a computerized decision aid including opportunities to: bridge clinician-patient communication about medical information while taking into account individual patients' decision-making preferences, complement expert clinician judgment with prognostic estimates, take advantage of patient waiting times, and make tasks involved during the clinic visit more efficient. These findings should be incorporated into the design and implementation of a computerized shared decision aid at an inner-city hospital.

摘要

背景与目的

计算机化决策辅助工具有助于在门诊临床护理过程中促进共同决策。本研究的目的是通过评估共同决策的当前实践、临床医生对计算机的使用情况、患者和临床医生对计算机化决策辅助工具的态度和信念,以及时间对共同决策的影响,来调查计算机化共同决策辅助工具在市中心诊所实施是否可行。

方法

对市中心门诊诊所的患者和临床医生进行观察和半结构化访谈,并进行定性数据分析。

结果

研究结果初步探讨了共同决策的普遍性以及对健康信息技术和决策辅助工具的态度。临床医生参与共同决策的一个突出障碍是认为患者对医疗信息缺乏理解。一些患者更希望临床医生为他们提供建议,而不是参与正式的共同决策。健康信息技术是门诊就诊的一个组成部分,受到大多数临床医生和患者的欢迎。一些患者表示希望使用健康信息技术,比如与临床医生一起在电脑屏幕上查看自己的医疗信息。所有参与者都接受在门诊就诊过程中整合决策辅助工具的想法,不过一些临床医生担心复杂医疗问题预后估计的准确性。

启示

我们确定了设计和实施计算机化决策辅助工具的几个重要考虑因素,包括以下机会:在考虑个体患者决策偏好的同时,弥合临床医生与患者之间关于医疗信息的沟通;用预后估计补充临床医生的专业判断;利用患者等待时间;提高门诊就诊过程中各项任务的效率。这些研究结果应纳入市中心医院计算机化共同决策辅助工具的设计和实施中。

相似文献

5
What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Feb;35(2):546-553. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05516-3. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
6
Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision-making in Early Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: a Qualitative Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4350-9. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
Clinician-Family Communication About Patients' Values and Preferences in Intensive Care Units.
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 1;179(5):676-684. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0027.
10
Point-of-care dashboards promote coproduction of healthcare services for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 29;33(Supplement_2):ii40-ii47. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab067.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 3;368(1):6-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1209500.
3
Why do patients derogate physicians who use a computer-based diagnostic support system?
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jan;33(1):108-18. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12453501. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
5
Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 May 23.
6
Development of PRIDe: a tool to assess physicians' preference of role in clinical decision making.
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
7
Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1109283.
9
Development and pretesting of a decision-aid to use when counseling parents facing imminent extreme premature delivery.
J Pediatr. 2012 Mar;160(3):382-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.08.070. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
10
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验