Patel Vihas, Liu Xiaoxia, Paul Michael, Belisle Caryn Domenici
1 Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Jun;15(3):227-32. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.074. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) via central venous catheters has improved nutrient delivery to patients unable to receive nutrition enterally, but its administration can be complicated by bacteremia and fungemia.
At a large tertiary-care academic medical center, 245 patients with concurrent positive blood cultures, among 1,716 adult patients who received TPN over a period of three consecutive years, were divided into those in whom parenteral nutrition was continued and those in whom it was stopped after the occurrence of a positive blood culture. To determine whether continuation of TPN after a positive blood culture was associated with a statistically significantly longer hospitalization than with its discontinuation after a positive blood culture, we performed a logistic regression analysis with step-wise selection, with parenteral nutrition status as the dependent variable and type of venous access, type of pathogen responsible for a positive blood culture, recurrence of a positive blood culture, respiratory failure, shock, and length of stay as covariates.
The prevalence of positive blood cultures was 14% among all hospitalized patients given parenteral nutrition. Parenteral nutrition was continued in 60% of the patients. Baseline co-morbid and laboratory parameters were comparable in the group of patients in whom TPN was continued and the group in which it was stopped except that the white blood cell count (WBC) was lower in the former group (9.1±6.6 mm(3) vs. 12±12.1 mm(3), p=0.015). Both groups received an average of 30 kcal/kg and 1.4 g protein/kg via TPN. There was no difference in the two groups in total calories, lipids, protein, or glutamine-base received before the occurrence of a positive blood culture (p=0.86, p=0.51, p=0.79, and p=0.42, respectively). The hospital stay of the group in which TPN was continued after a positive blood culture was statistically significantly longer than that of the group in which it was discontinued (44.6±32.3 d vs. 28.2±18.5 d, p<0.001). This difference remained significant in the multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Continuation of TPN after a positive blood culture was associated with statistically significantly longer hospitalization before and after adjustment for co-morbid conditions.
通过中心静脉导管进行的全胃肠外营养(TPN)改善了对无法经肠道接受营养的患者的营养供给,但这种给药方式可能会并发菌血症和真菌血症。
在一家大型三级医疗学术医学中心,在连续三年接受TPN的1716例成年患者中,245例血培养呈阳性的患者被分为继续接受肠外营养的患者和血培养呈阳性后停止肠外营养的患者。为了确定血培养呈阳性后继续TPN是否与血培养呈阳性后停止TPN相比在统计学上有显著更长的住院时间,我们进行了逐步选择的逻辑回归分析,以肠外营养状态作为因变量,静脉通路类型、血培养呈阳性的病原体类型、血培养复发、呼吸衰竭、休克和住院时间作为协变量。
在所有接受肠外营养的住院患者中,血培养阳性的发生率为14%。60%的患者继续接受肠外营养。继续TPN的患者组和停止TPN的患者组的基线合并症和实验室参数具有可比性,只是前一组的白细胞计数(WBC)较低(9.1±6.6/mm³对12±12.1/mm³,p = 0.015)。两组通过TPN平均接受30kcal/kg的热量和1.4g/kg的蛋白质。在血培养呈阳性之前,两组在总热量、脂质、蛋白质或谷氨酰胺方面没有差异(分别为p = 0.86、p = 0.51、p = 0.79和p = 0.42)。血培养呈阳性后继续TPN的组的住院时间在统计学上显著长于停止TPN的组(44.6±32.3天对28.2±18.5天,p < 0.001)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,这种差异仍然显著。
血培养呈阳性后继续TPN与在调整合并症前后统计学上显著更长的住院时间相关。