Program in Social-Organizational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Am Psychol. 2014 Apr;69(3):269-84. doi: 10.1037/a0036106.
Research on social networks has grown exponentially in recent years. However, despite its relevance, the field of psychology has been relatively slow to explain the underlying goal pursuit and resistance processes influencing social networks in the first place. In this vein, this article aims to demonstrate how a dynamic network theory perspective explains the way in which social networks influence these processes and related outcomes, such as goal achievement, performance, learning, and emotional contagion at the interpersonal level of analysis. The theory integrates goal pursuit, motivation, and conflict conceptualizations from psychology with social network concepts from sociology and organizational science to provide a taxonomy of social network role behaviors, such as goal striving, system supporting, goal preventing, system negating, and observing. This theoretical perspective provides psychologists with new tools to map social networks (e.g., dynamic network charts), which can help inform the development of change interventions. Implications for social, industrial-organizational, and counseling psychology as well as conflict resolution are discussed, and new opportunities for research are highlighted, such as those related to dynamic network intelligence (also known as cognitive accuracy), levels of analysis, methodological/ethical issues, and the need to theoretically broaden the study of social networking and social media behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
近年来,社交网络的研究呈指数级增长。然而,尽管其相关性很强,但心理学领域在解释影响社交网络的潜在目标追求和阻力过程方面一直相对缓慢。正是出于这种考虑,本文旨在展示动态网络理论视角如何解释社交网络影响这些过程以及相关结果(如人际层面的目标达成、绩效、学习和情绪感染)的方式。该理论将心理学中的目标追求、动机和冲突概念与社会学和组织科学中的社会网络概念相结合,为社交网络角色行为提供了分类,如目标追求、系统支持、目标阻碍、系统否定和观察。这种理论视角为心理学家提供了绘制社交网络的新工具(例如,动态网络图),这有助于为变革干预措施的制定提供信息。本文还讨论了对社会心理学、工业组织心理学和咨询心理学以及冲突解决的启示,并强调了新的研究机会,例如与动态网络智能(也称为认知准确性)、分析水平、方法/伦理问题以及扩大社交网络和社交媒体行为研究的理论基础有关的机会。(APA 心理学数据库记录(c)2014,保留所有权利)。