Chang Gregory, Honig Stephen, Liu Yinxiao, Chen Cheng, Chu Kevin K, Rajapakse Chamith S, Egol Kenneth, Xia Ding, Saha Punam K, Regatte Ravinder R
Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, Center for Musculoskeletal Care, 333 E. 38th Street, 6th Floor, Room 6-210, New York, NY, 10016, USA,
J Bone Miner Metab. 2015 May;33(3):285-93. doi: 10.1007/s00774-014-0588-4. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
Osteoporosis is a disease of poor bone quality. Bone mineral density (BMD) has limited ability to discriminate between subjects without and with poor bone quality, and assessment of bone microarchitecture may have added value in this regard. Our goals were to use 7 T MRI to: (1) quantify and compare distal femur bone microarchitecture in women without and with poor bone quality (defined clinically by presence of fragility fractures); and (2) determine whether microarchitectural parameters could be used to discriminate between these two groups. This study had institutional review board approval, and we obtained written informed consent from all subjects. We used a 28-channel knee coil to image the distal femur of 31 subjects with fragility fractures and 25 controls without fracture on a 7 T MRI scanner using a 3-D fast low angle shot sequence (0.234 mm × 0.234 mm × 1 mm, parallel imaging factor = 2, acquisition time = 7 min 9 s). We applied digital topological analysis to quantify parameters of bone microarchitecture. All subjects also underwent standard clinical BMD assessment in the hip and spine. Compared to controls, fracture cases demonstrated lower bone volume fraction and markers of trabecular number, plate-like structure, and plate-to-rod ratio, and higher markers of trabecular isolation, rod disruption, and network resorption (p < 0.05 for all). There were no differences in hip or spine BMD T-scores between groups (p > 0.05). In receiver-operating-characteristics analyses, microarchitectural parameters could discriminate cases and controls (AUC = 0.66-0.73, p < 0.05). Hip and spine BMD T-scores could not discriminate cases and controls (AUC = 0.58-0.64, p ≥ 0.08). We conclude that 7 T MRI can detect bone microarchitectural deterioration in women with fragility fractures who do not differ by BMD. Microarchitectural parameters might some day be used as an additional tool to detect patients with poor bone quality who cannot be detected by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
骨质疏松症是一种骨质量不佳的疾病。骨密度(BMD)区分骨质量正常和不佳的受试者的能力有限,而骨微结构评估在这方面可能具有附加价值。我们的目标是使用7T磁共振成像(MRI)来:(1)量化和比较骨质量正常和不佳的女性(临床上通过脆性骨折的存在来定义)的股骨远端骨微结构;(2)确定微结构参数是否可用于区分这两组。本研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准,并且我们获得了所有受试者的书面知情同意书。我们使用一个28通道的膝关节线圈,在一台7T MRI扫描仪上,采用三维快速低角度激发序列(0.234毫米×0.234毫米×1毫米,并行成像因子=2,采集时间=7分9秒),对31例有脆性骨折的受试者和25例无骨折的对照者的股骨远端进行成像。我们应用数字拓扑分析来量化骨微结构参数。所有受试者还接受了髋部和脊柱的标准临床骨密度评估。与对照组相比,骨折病例的骨体积分数以及小梁数量、板状结构和板杆比的指标较低,而小梁分离、杆破坏和网络吸收的指标较高(所有p<0.05)。两组之间髋部或脊柱的骨密度T值没有差异(p>0.05)。在受试者工作特征分析中,微结构参数能够区分病例组和对照组(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.66 - 0.73,p<0.05)。髋部和脊柱的骨密度T值不能区分病例组和对照组(AUC=0.58 - 0.64,p≥0.08)。我们得出结论,7T MRI能够检测出骨密度无差异的脆性骨折女性的骨微结构恶化情况。微结构参数可能有朝一日会作为一种附加工具,用于检测双能X线吸收法(DXA)无法检测出的骨质量不佳的患者。