Chok Kenneth S H, Cheung Tan To, Lo Regina C L, Chu Ferdinand S K, Tsang Simon H Y, Chan Albert C Y, Sharr William W, Fung James Y Y, Dai Wing Chiu, Chan See Ching, Fan Sheung Tat, Lo Chung Mau
Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Liver Transpl. 2014 Aug;20(8):912-21. doi: 10.1002/lt.23892. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
The objective of this study was to investigate the outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation as a bridging therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had been wait-listed for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Adult patients with unresectable and unablatable HCCs within the University of California San Francisco criteria who had been wait-listed for DDLT were screened for their suitability for HIFU ablation as a bridging therapy if they were not suitable for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Treatment outcomes for patients receiving HIFU ablation, TACE, and best medical treatment (BMT) were compared. Fifty-one patients were included in the analysis. Before the introduction of HIFU ablation, only 39.2% of the patients had received bridging therapy (TACE only, n = 20). With HIFU ablation in use, the rate increased dramatically to 80.4% (TACE + HIFU, n = 41). The overall dropout rate was 51% (n = 26). Patients in the BMT group had a significantly higher dropout rate (P = 0.03) and significantly poorer liver function as reflected by higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores and higher Child-Pugh grading. Clinically relevant ascites was found in 5 patients in the HIFU group and 2 patients in the BMT group, but none was found in the TACE group (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). The TACE and HIFU groups had comparable percentages of tumor necrosis in excised livers (P = 0.35), and both were significantly higher than that in the BMT group (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). In conclusion, HIFU ablation was safe even for HCC patients with Child-Pugh C disease. Its adoption increased the percentage of patients receiving bridging therapy from 39.2% to 80.4%. A randomized controlled trial for further validation of its efficacy is warranted.
本研究的目的是调查高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)消融作为桥接治疗对已被列入已故供体肝移植(DDLT)等待名单的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的治疗效果。在加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校标准范围内,对已被列入DDLT等待名单的不可切除且不可消融的HCC成年患者进行筛查,若他们不适合经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE),则评估其是否适合HIFU消融作为桥接治疗。比较接受HIFU消融、TACE和最佳药物治疗(BMT)的患者的治疗效果。51例患者纳入分析。在引入HIFU消融之前,仅39.2%的患者接受了桥接治疗(仅TACE,n = 20)。使用HIFU消融后,这一比例大幅增至80.4%(TACE + HIFU,n = 41)。总体退出率为51%(n = 26)。BMT组患者的退出率显著更高(P = 0.03),且终末期肝病模型评分更高和Child-Pugh分级更高,这反映出其肝功能明显更差。HIFU组有5例患者出现临床相关腹水,BMT组有2例患者出现临床相关腹水,但TACE组未发现(分别为P = 0.01和P = 0.03)。TACE组和HIFU组切除肝脏中的肿瘤坏死百分比相当(P = 0.35),且均显著高于BMT组(分别为P = 0.01和P = 0.02)。总之,即使对于Child-Pugh C级疾病的HCC患者,HIFU消融也是安全的。其应用使接受桥接治疗的患者比例从39.2%提高到了80.4%。有必要进行一项随机对照试验以进一步验证其疗效。