Granberg Sarah, Swanepoel De Wet, Englund Ulrika, Möller Claes, Danermark Berth
* Audiological Research Centre, Örebro University Hospital, School of Health and Medical Sciences/Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Örebro University , Örebro , Sweden.
Int J Audiol. 2014 Aug;53(8):497-506. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.900196. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
To identify relevant aspects of functioning, disability, and contextual factors for adults with hearing loss (HL) from hearing health professional perspective summarized using the ICF classification as reference tool.
Internet-based cross-sectional survey using open-ended questions. Responses were analysed using a simplified content analysis approach to link concept to ICF categories according to linking rules.
Hearing health professionals (experts) recruited through e-mail distribution lists of professional organizations and personal networks of ICF core set for hearing loss steering committee members. Stratified sampling according to profession and world region enhanced the international and professional representation.
Sixty-three experts constituted the stratified sample used in the analysis. A total of 1726 meaningful concepts were identified in this study, resulting in 209 distinctive ICF categories, with 106 mentioned by 5% or more of respondents. Most categories in the activities & participation component related to communication, while the most frequent environmental factors related to the physical environment such as hearing aids or noise. Mental functions, such as confidence or emotional functions were also frequently highlighted.
More than half (53.3%) of the entire ICF classification categories were included in the expert survey results. This emphasizes the importance of a multidimensional tool, such as the ICF, for assessing persons with hearing loss.
从听力健康专业人员的角度,识别使用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)作为参考工具总结的听力损失(HL)成人的功能、残疾和背景因素的相关方面。
采用开放式问题的基于互联网的横断面调查。根据链接规则,使用简化的内容分析方法将概念与ICF类别相联系来分析回答。
通过专业组织的电子邮件分发列表和ICF听力损失核心集指导委员会成员的个人网络招募听力健康专业人员(专家)。根据职业和世界区域进行分层抽样,增强了国际和专业代表性。
63名专家构成了分析中使用的分层样本。本研究共识别出1726个有意义的概念,产生了209个独特的ICF类别,其中106个类别有5%或更多的受访者提及。活动与参与部分的大多数类别与沟通有关,而最常见的环境因素与物理环境有关,如助听器或噪音。心理功能,如信心或情绪功能也经常被强调。
专家调查结果涵盖了整个ICF分类类别的一半以上(53.3%)。这强调了像ICF这样的多维工具在评估听力损失患者方面的重要性。