• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你的血管造影正常的冠状动脉能保持正常多久?一项初步研究。

How long do your angiographically normal coronary arteries remain normal? A pilot study.

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Soroka Medical Center and Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Cardiology Department, Soroka Medical Center and Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel

出版信息

Angiology. 2015 Mar;66(3):262-4. doi: 10.1177/0003319714531646. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1177/0003319714531646
PMID:24755697
Abstract

Coronary atherosclerosis is a progressive disease. We sought to determine whether this fact also applies to patients at an advanced age with normal coronary arteries (NCAs) undergoing repeat catheterization at least 5 years later. Of the 189 patients who were found to have NCAs, 154 (81%) remained with NCAs and 35 (19%) developed obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD). Development of OCAD was observed at all ages. Isolated risk factors were not associated with the appearance of OCAD, but the combination of diabetes mellitus with age >65 years or with smoking was associated with the appearance of OCAD (P = .04 for both). In conclusion, the finding of angiographically NCAs in elderly individuals does not prevent the later development of OCAD.

摘要

冠状动脉粥样硬化是一种进行性疾病。我们试图确定这一事实是否也适用于至少 5 年后再次接受导管检查的年龄较大且冠状动脉正常 (NCA) 的患者。在 189 名被发现存在 NCA 的患者中,154 名 (81%) 仍存在 NCA,35 名 (19%) 发展为阻塞性冠状动脉疾病 (OCAD)。在所有年龄段都观察到了 OCAD 的发展。孤立的危险因素与 OCAD 的出现无关,但糖尿病与年龄 >65 岁或与吸烟相结合与 OCAD 的出现有关 (两者均为 P =.04)。总之,在老年人中发现血管造影 NCA 并不能预防后期 OCAD 的发生。

相似文献

1
How long do your angiographically normal coronary arteries remain normal? A pilot study.你的血管造影正常的冠状动脉能保持正常多久?一项初步研究。
Angiology. 2015 Mar;66(3):262-4. doi: 10.1177/0003319714531646. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
2
Repeat coronary angiography with previously normal arteries: a futile exercise?冠状动脉造影复查显示先前正常的动脉:徒劳无益的检查?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb 15;85(3):401-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25589. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
3
Body mass index as a predictor of the presence but not the severity of coronary artery disease evaluated by cardiac computed tomography.通过心脏计算机断层扫描评估,体重指数可作为冠状动脉疾病存在与否而非严重程度的预测指标。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1387-93. doi: 10.1177/2047487313494291. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
4
A simple prediction model to estimate obstructive coronary artery disease.一种用于估计阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的简单预测模型。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Jan 16;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0745-0.
5
Lifetime cumulative exposure to waterpipe smoking is associated with coronary artery disease.水烟吸食的终生累积暴露与冠状动脉疾病相关。
Atherosclerosis. 2014 Jun;234(2):454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.03.036. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
6
Association of progression or regression of coronary artery atherosclerosis with long-term prognosis.冠状动脉粥样硬化的进展或消退与长期预后的关联
Am Heart J. 2016 Jul;177:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.03.016. Epub 2016 May 6.
7
[Comparative analysis of atherosclerotic plaque distribution in the left main coronary artery and proximal segments of left anterior descending and left circumflex arteries in patients qualified for percutaneous coronary angioplasty].[适合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者左冠状动脉主干及左前降支和左旋支近端节段动脉粥样硬化斑块分布的比较分析]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2006;52(2):51-62; discussion 62-3.
8
Risk factors for coronary artery disease in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography in Jordan.约旦择期冠状动脉造影患者冠状动脉疾病的危险因素。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0620-4.
9
Practical cardiovascular risk calculator for asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: PRECISE-DM risk score.适用于 2 型糖尿病无症状患者的实用心血管风险计算器:PRESCISE-DM 风险评分。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Sep;43(9):1040-1047. doi: 10.1002/clc.23405. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
10
Comparison of different cardiac risk scores for coronary artery disease in symptomatic women: do female-specific risk factors matter?有症状女性冠状动脉疾病不同心脏风险评分的比较:女性特异性危险因素重要吗?
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1443-50. doi: 10.1177/2047487313494571. Epub 2013 Jun 26.