Hess Connie N, Peterson Eric D, Neely Megan L, Dai David, Hillegass William B, Krucoff Mitchell W, Kutcher Michael A, Messenger John C, Pancholy Samir, Piana Robert N, Rao Sunil V
From the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (C.N.H., E.D.P., M.L.N., D.D., M.W.K., S.V.R.); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (W.B.H.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (M.A.K.); University of Colorado, Denver, CO (J.C.M.); The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, PA (S.P.); Vanderbilt Heart Center, Nashville, TN (R.N.P.).
Circulation. 2014 Jun 3;129(22):2277-86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006356. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
Adoption of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI) in the United States is low and may be related to challenges learning the technique. We examined the relationships between operator TRI volume and procedural metrics and outcomes.
We used CathPCI Registry data from July 2009 to December 2012 to identify new radial operators, defined by an exclusively femoral percutaneous coronary intervention approach for 6 months after their first percutaneous coronary intervention in the database and ≥15 total TRIs thereafter. Primary outcomes of fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and procedure success were chosen as markers of technical proficiency. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, bleeding, and vascular complications. Adjusted outcomes were analyzed by using operator TRI experience as a continuous variable with generalized linear mixed models. Among 54 561 TRI procedures performed at 704 sites, 942 operators performed 1 to 10 procedures, 942 operators performed 11 to 50 procedures, 375 operators performed 51 to 100 procedures, and 148 operators performed 101 to 200 procedures. As radial caseload increased, more TRIs were performed in women, in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and for emergency indications. Decreased fluoroscopy time and contrast use were nonlinearly associated with greater operator TRI experience, with faster reductions observed for newer (<30-50 cases) compared with more experienced (>30-50 cases) operators. Procedure success was high, whereas mortality, bleeding, and vascular complications remained low across TRI volumes.
As operator TRI volume increases, higher-risk patients are chosen for TRI. Despite this, operator proficiency improves with greater TRI experience, and safety is maintained. The threshold to overcome the learning curve appears to be approximately 30 to 50 cases.
经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗(TRI)在美国的应用率较低,可能与学习该技术的挑战有关。我们研究了术者TRI手术量与手术指标及结果之间的关系。
我们使用2009年7月至2012年12月的CathPCI注册数据来识别新的桡动脉术者,并将其定义为在数据库中首次接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的6个月内仅采用股动脉途径进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,此后进行≥15例TRI手术。选择透视时间、造影剂用量和手术成功率等主要结果作为技术熟练程度的指标,并将住院死亡率、出血和血管并发症作为次要结果。通过将术者TRI经验作为连续变量,采用广义线性混合模型分析校正后的结果。在704个中心进行的54561例TRI手术中,942名术者进行了1至10例手术,942名术者进行了11至50例手术,375名术者进行了51至100例手术,148名术者进行了101至200例手术。随着桡动脉手术量增加,女性、ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者以及急诊患者接受TRI手术的比例增加。透视时间和造影剂用量的减少与术者TRI经验增加呈非线性相关,与经验丰富(>30-50例)的术者相比,经验较少(<30-50例)的术者减少速度更快。手术成功率较高,而各TRI手术量组的死亡率、出血和血管并发症发生率较低。
随着术者TRI手术量增加,接受TRI手术的高危患者增多。尽管如此,术者熟练程度随TRI经验增加而提高,且安全性得以维持。克服学习曲线的阈值似乎约为30至50例。