• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中经桡动脉入路选择的风险-治疗悖论。

Risk-treatment paradox in the selection of transradial access for percutaneous coronary intervention.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 May 24;2(3):e000174. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000174.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.113.000174
PMID:23709565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3698780/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Access site complications contribute to morbidity and mortality during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Transradial arterial access significantly lowers the risk of access site complications compared to transfemoral arteriotomy. We sought to develop a prediction model for access site complications in patients undergoing PCI with femoral arteriotomy, and assess whether transradial access was selectively used in patients at high risk for complications.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed 17 509 patients who underwent PCI without circulatory support from 2008 to 2011 at 5 institutions. Transradial arterial access was used in 17.8% of patients. In those who underwent transfemoral access, 177 (1.2%) patients had access site complications. Using preprocedural clinical and demographic data, a prediction model for femoral arteriotomy complications was generated. The variables retained in the model included: elevated age (P<0.001), female gender (P<0.001), elevated troponin (P<0.001), decreased renal function or dialysis (P=0.002), emergent PCI (P=0.01), prior PCI (P=0.005), diabetes (P=0.008), and peripheral artery disease (P=0.003). The model showed moderate discrimination (optimism-adjusted c-statistic=0.72) and was internally validated via bootstrap resampling. Patients with higher predicted risk of complications via transfemoral access were less likely to receive transradial access (P<0.001). Similar results were seen in patients presenting with and without ST-segment myocardial infarction and when adjusting for individual physician operator.

CONCLUSIONS

We generated and validated a model for transfemoral access site complications during PCI. Paradoxically, patients most likely to develop access site complications from transfemoral access, and therefore benefit from transradial access, were the least likely to receive transradial access.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)过程中,入路部位并发症可导致发病率和死亡率升高。与经股动脉切开术相比,经桡动脉入路可显著降低入路部位并发症的风险。我们旨在建立一个预测行经股动脉切开术 PCI 患者入路部位并发症的模型,并评估经桡动脉入路是否选择性地应用于并发症风险较高的患者。

方法和结果

我们分析了 2008 年至 2011 年 5 家机构的 17509 例未接受循环支持的 PCI 患者。其中 17.8%的患者采用经桡动脉入路。在接受经股动脉入路的患者中,177 例(1.2%)发生入路部位并发症。使用术前临床和人口统计学数据,建立了经股动脉切开术并发症预测模型。模型中保留的变量包括:高龄(P<0.001)、女性(P<0.001)、肌钙蛋白升高(P<0.001)、肾功能或透析下降(P=0.002)、紧急 PCI(P=0.01)、既往 PCI(P=0.005)、糖尿病(P=0.008)和外周动脉疾病(P=0.003)。该模型具有中等的区分度(经校正后乐观 c 统计量=0.72),通过 bootstrap 重采样进行内部验证。通过经股动脉切开术预测并发症风险较高的患者接受经桡动脉入路的可能性较小(P<0.001)。在有和没有 ST 段抬高心肌梗死的患者中以及在考虑个体术者的情况下,都观察到了类似的结果。

结论

我们建立并验证了一个 PCI 经股动脉入路部位并发症预测模型。矛盾的是,经股动脉切开术入路部位并发症风险最高、因此从经桡动脉入路中获益最大的患者,接受经桡动脉入路的可能性最小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9940/3698780/726107935b37/jah3-2-e000174-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9940/3698780/e72a1d356a69/jah3-2-e000174-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9940/3698780/fc069282821c/jah3-2-e000174-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9940/3698780/726107935b37/jah3-2-e000174-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9940/3698780/e72a1d356a69/jah3-2-e000174-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9940/3698780/fc069282821c/jah3-2-e000174-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9940/3698780/726107935b37/jah3-2-e000174-g3.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk-treatment paradox in the selection of transradial access for percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中经桡动脉入路选择的风险-治疗悖论。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 May 24;2(3):e000174. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000174.
2
Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access in Patients Undergoing Rescue Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Fibrinolytic Therapy.经溶栓治疗后行补救性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中行桡动脉入路与股动脉入路的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 21;8(14):1868-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.028.
3
Comparison of transradial and transfemoral access in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary lesions.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗复杂冠状动脉病变患者中的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 1;89(4):640-646. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26669. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
4
Arterial access site and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with and without vorapaxar.接受或未接受vorapaxar的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的动脉穿刺部位及治疗结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug;88(2):163-73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26335. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
5
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With History of CABG Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization Via the Radial Versus Femoral Approach.有冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)史的患者行经桡动脉与股动脉入路行心导管检查的特征和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 26;14(8):907-916. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.053. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
6
Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset.英国经溶栓治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中穿刺部位操作对临床结局的影响:来自英国心血管介入学会数据集的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 27;10(22):2258-2265. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.049.
7
Comparison of 3-year clinical outcomes after transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention.经桡动脉与经股动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后3年临床结局的比较。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2012 May;27(2):84-92. doi: 10.1007/s12928-012-0098-z. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
8
Access site-related complications after transradial catheterization can be reduced with smaller sheath size and statins.经桡动脉导管插入术后与穿刺部位相关的并发症可以通过使用更小尺寸的鞘管和他汀类药物来减少。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2012 Sep;27(3):174-80. doi: 10.1007/s12928-012-0108-1. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
9
A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉旁路移植血管造影和介入治疗的随机对比:RADIAL-CABG 试验(经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉旁路移植血管造影和介入治疗的比较)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
10
Radial versus femoral approach for same-day inter-facility transfer for percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗当日机构间转运的桡动脉与股动脉入路比较
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Apr;31(2):230-235. doi: 10.1111/joic.12486. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Transradial intervention in dialysis patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a Japanese nationwide registry study.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的透析患者的经桡动脉介入治疗:一项日本全国性注册研究。
Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Nov 14;3(6):oead116. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead116. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Impact of Access Site on Periprocedural Bleeding and Cerebral and Coronary Events in High-Bleeding-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings from the RIVA-PCI Trial.穿刺部位对高出血风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围手术期出血及脑卒中和冠状动脉事件的影响:RIVA-PCI试验结果
Cardiol Ther. 2024 Mar;13(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s40119-023-00343-4. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology.经皮心血管介入治疗中桡动脉入路的共识文件:欧洲经皮心血管介入治疗协会和急性心脏护理工作组以及欧洲心脏病学会血栓形成工作组的立场文件。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Mar;8(11):1242-51. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I11A192.
2
Association between periprocedural bleeding and long-term outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in older patients.老年患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围术期出血与长期预后的关系。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep;5(9):958-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.010.
3
Assessment of In-Hospital Mortality and Its Risk Factors in Patients with Myocardial Infarction Considering the Logistical Aspects of the Treatment Process-A Single-Center, Retrospective, Observational Study.
考虑治疗过程的后勤方面,评估心肌梗死患者的院内死亡率及其危险因素:一项单中心回顾性观察研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 17;20(4):3603. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043603.
4
Navigation of a Dormant AV Fistula for PCI in a Patient With High-Risk NSTEMI.高危非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中对隐匿性动静脉内瘘的定位
JACC Case Rep. 2020 Aug 5;2(11):1671-1674. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.05.084. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Transradial Access for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications of the Risk-Treatment Paradox.经桡动脉入路行高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:风险-治疗悖论的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul;14(7):e009328. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009328. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
6
Occupational radiation exposure in femoral artery approach is higher than radial artery approach during coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention.经股动脉途径行冠状动脉造影或介入治疗时的职业照射剂量高于经桡动脉途径。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 28;10(1):7104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62794-2.
7
Untapped potential of multicenter studies: a review of cardiovascular risk prediction models revealed inappropriate analyses and wide variation in reporting.多中心研究的未开发潜力:对心血管风险预测模型的综述揭示了分析不当和报告差异巨大的问题。
Diagn Progn Res. 2019 Feb 22;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0046-9. eCollection 2019.
8
Trans-radial percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency and/or on dialysis.经桡动脉途径对严重慢性肾功能不全和/或正在接受透析治疗的患者进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Heart Vessels. 2019 Sep;34(9):1412-1419. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01387-0. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
9
Behavioral Influence of Known Prognostic Markers on the Cardiologist's Decision following Acute Coronary Syndrome: the GRACE Score Paradox.已知预后标志物对急性冠状动脉综合征后心脏病专家决策的行为影响:GRACE 评分悖论。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019 Jun;112(6):721-726. doi: 10.5935/abc.20190046. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
10
Reversing the "Risk-Treatment Paradox" of Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Risk-Concordant Use of Bleeding Avoidance Strategies Is Associated With Reduced Bleeding and Lower Costs.逆转行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者出血的“风险-治疗悖论”:风险一致的出血预防策略的使用与降低出血和降低成本相关。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Nov 6;7(21):e008551. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008551.
Access site selection for primary PCI: the evidence for transradial access is strong.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的穿刺部位选择:经桡动脉穿刺的证据充分。
Heart. 2012 Sep;98(18):1392; author reply 1392-3. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-301935. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
4
Temporal trends in and factors associated with bleeding complications among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data CathPCI Registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者出血并发症的时间趋势及相关因素:来自全国心血管数据经皮冠状动脉介入治疗登记库的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 May 22;59(21):1861-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.045.
5
Prediction of long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.老年患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后长期死亡率的预测:来自国家心血管数据注册中心的结果。
Circulation. 2012 Mar 27;125(12):1501-10. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.066969. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
6
Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.十项关于直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉与股动脉入路有效性的随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Mar 15;109(6):813-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
7
Influence of access site selection on PCI-related adverse events in patients with STEMI: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相关不良事件与梗死相关动脉(IRA)入路选择的关系:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Heart. 2012 Feb;98(4):303-11. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300558. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
8
Risk stratification schemes, anticoagulation use and outcomes: the risk--treatment paradox in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation.风险分层方案、抗凝药物使用与结局:新发非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的治疗-风险悖论。
Heart. 2011 Dec;97(24):2046-50. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300901. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
9
The end of the risk-treatment paradox? A rising tide lifts all boats.风险治疗悖论的终结?水涨船高。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 18;58(17):1766-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.028.
10
Impact of in-hospital major bleeding on late clinical outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial.在急性心肌梗死的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中,院内大出血对晚期临床结局的影响:HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死的血管重建和支架与优化结果的研究)试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 18;58(17):1750-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.021.