Rettenmaier Alexander, Lenarz Thomas, Reuter Günter
Dept. of Experimental Otology, ENT-Clinics, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Biomed Opt Express. 2014 Mar 3;5(4):1014-25. doi: 10.1364/BOE.5.001014. eCollection 2014 Apr 1.
Optical stimulation of the inner ear has recently attracted attention, suggesting a higher frequency resolution compared to electrical cochlear implants due to its high spatial stimulation selectivity. Although the feasibility of the effect is shown in multiple in vivo experiments, the stimulation mechanism remains open to discussion. Here we investigate in single-cell measurements the reaction of spiral ganglion neurons and model cells to irradiation with a nanosecond-pulsed laser beam over a broad wavelength range from 420 nm up to 1950 nm using the patch clamp technique. Cell reactions were wavelength- and pulse-energy-dependent but too small to elicit action potentials in the investigated spiral ganglion neurons. As the applied radiant exposure was much higher than the reported threshold for in vivo experiments in the same laser regime, we conclude that in a stimulation paradigm with nanosecond-pulses, direct neuronal stimulation is not the main cause of optical cochlea stimulation.
内耳的光刺激最近引起了关注,由于其高空间刺激选择性,与电耳蜗植入物相比,它具有更高的频率分辨率。尽管在多个体内实验中显示了这种效应的可行性,但刺激机制仍有待讨论。在这里,我们使用膜片钳技术,在单细胞测量中研究了螺旋神经节神经元和模型细胞对从420纳米到1950纳米的宽波长范围内的纳秒脉冲激光束照射的反应。细胞反应依赖于波长和脉冲能量,但太小以至于无法在所研究的螺旋神经节神经元中引发动作电位。由于所施加的辐射暴露远高于相同激光条件下体内实验报道的阈值,我们得出结论,在纳秒脉冲的刺激模式下,直接神经元刺激不是光耳蜗刺激的主要原因。