Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Haemophilia. 2014 May;20 Suppl 4:4-10. doi: 10.1111/hae.12429.
Care for people with haemophilia (PWH) has improved much over the last two decades leading to near normal lives for those receiving early regular prophylaxis with clotting factor concentrates (CFC). Yet, there are significant limitations of those practices. In the absence of a well-defined optimal prophylaxis protocol, there are wide variations in practices with a two to threefold difference in doses. In those parts of the world where there are constraints on the availability of CFC, episodic replacement remains the norm for most patients even though it is evident that this does not change the natural history of the disease over a wide range of doses. Suitable prophylactic protocols therefore need to be developed wherever possible at these doses. Finally, there are only limited data on long-term outcomes in haemophilia from anywhere in the world. The practice of documenting specific outcomes as part of the regular evaluation of PWH needs to be established and the appropriate instruments used to assess them. Definitions of clinical events and endpoints of interventions in clinical studies are being developed to help such data collection. The correlations between different replacement therapy protocols and specific outcomes will help define what is best at different dose levels. Such data will allow better health planning and treatment choices throughout the world.
在过去的二十年中,对血友病患者(PWH)的护理有了很大的改善,那些接受早期常规凝血因子浓缩物(CFC)预防治疗的患者几乎可以过上正常的生活。然而,这些治疗方法仍然存在着显著的局限性。由于缺乏明确的最佳预防方案,实践中存在着广泛的差异,剂量差异达两到三倍。在那些 CFC 供应有限的世界地区,即使明显的是,在广泛的剂量范围内,这种治疗方法并不能改变疾病的自然史,但对大多数患者来说,间歇性替代治疗仍然是常规治疗。因此,在这些剂量下,需要尽可能在各个地方制定合适的预防性方案。最后,全世界只有有限的数据可以说明血友病的长期预后。作为对 PWH 定期评估的一部分,记录具体结果的做法需要建立起来,需要使用适当的工具来评估这些结果。正在制定临床研究中临床事件和干预措施终点的定义,以帮助收集此类数据。不同替代治疗方案与具体结果之间的相关性将有助于确定在不同剂量水平下什么是最好的。此类数据将允许在全球范围内更好地进行卫生规划和治疗选择。