Guirro Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus, Guirro Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira, Alves de Sousa Natanael Teixeira
Laboratory of Physiotherapeutic Resources, Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor System, Laboratory of Physiotherapeutic Resources, Ribeirão Preto Medical School of University of the São Paulo, Brazil ; Post-Graduation Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, Ribeirão Preto Medical School of the University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Post-Graduation Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, Ribeirão Preto Medical School of the University of São Paulo, Brazil.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Apr;26(4):557-62. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.557. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
Although shortwave diathermy has been widely used by physiotherapists, there are a few studies assessing the performance of the equipment in use. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the procedures adopted by physiotherapists as users of shortwave diathermy continuous (CSWD), as well as to measure the power output and frequency of CSWD equipment. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty-three physical therapists were interviewed and 23 CSWD equipment were evaluated. Admeasurement was carried out by using a standard phantom to simulate the electrode-skin distance, which ranged from 0.5 to 3.0 cm. Data analysis was performed by using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and a post-hoc Tukey's test or Pearson's correlation coefficient. [Results] The questionnaires showed that 48% of the interviewees use the correct electrode-skin distance, 70% use a single electrical outlet, and 35% use a grounded electrical outlet, and that 48% of the physiotherapy tables and 61% of the plinths were made of wood. However, only 13% of the interviewees perform yearly preventive maintenance. The highest power (95.56 W) was achieved at electrode-skin distances ranging from 1.0 to 1.5 cm, with distances of 2.5 cm and 3.0 cm being null in four and eight equipment, respectively. There was a negative correlation between power output and electrode-skin distance as well as between power output and purchase date. [Conclusion] The physiotherapists involved in this study had inadequate knowledge about the correct use of CSWD equipment, which may adversely affect its performance and patient safety.
尽管短波透热疗法已被物理治疗师广泛使用,但评估在用设备性能的研究却很少。本研究的目的是评估物理治疗师作为短波连续透热疗法(CSWD)使用者所采用的程序,以及测量CSWD设备的功率输出和频率。[对象与方法]对23名物理治疗师进行了访谈,并对23台CSWD设备进行了评估。通过使用标准体模模拟电极与皮肤的距离进行测量,距离范围为0.5至3.0厘米。数据分析采用描述性统计、方差分析以及事后的Tukey检验或Pearson相关系数。[结果]问卷显示,48%的受访者使用正确的电极与皮肤距离,70%使用单个电源插座,35%使用接地电源插座,48%的理疗床和61%的底座是木制的。然而,只有13%的受访者进行年度预防性维护。在电极与皮肤距离为1.0至1.5厘米时达到最高功率(95.56瓦),在2.5厘米和3.0厘米距离时,分别有4台和8台设备功率为零。功率输出与电极与皮肤距离以及功率输出与购买日期之间存在负相关。[结论]参与本研究的物理治疗师对CSWD设备的正确使用知识不足,这可能会对其性能和患者安全产生不利影响。