Shields Nora, Gormley John, O'Hare Neil
School of Physiotherapy, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Physiother Res Int. 2002;7(4):191-202. doi: 10.1002/pri.259.
Short-wave diathermy (SWD) is widely available, yet a comprehensive examination of current clinical practice remains absent from the literature. The present paper aims to assess clinical and safety issues in continuous (CSWD) and pulsed (PSWD) short-wave diathermy application and subsequently indicate areas for future research.
A postal survey was carried out among 116 senior physiotherapists in 41 Irish hospital-based physiotherapy departments.
The response rate to the study was 75%. Analysis found that PSWD was the preferred mode of treatment with 27% of respondents using it more than once daily. Respondents considered both modes of treatment indicated for a variety of conditions. CSWD was rated as an effective treatment for chronic osteoarthritis, polyarthritis, non-specific arthrosis and haematomas. PSWD was reported an effective modality for acute soft tissue injury, haematomas, acute osteoarthritis, sinusitis and rheumatoid arthritis. Dose selection varied greatly but tended to be based on the type, nature and duration of the condition. Analysis of safety practices uncovered concerning findings. Although a high level of agreement was found on measures for patient safety, 30% of respondents reported that no measures for operator safety were taken and only five respondents stated they remained a specified distance from SWD equipment. Measures to ensure the safety of other personnel in the physiotherapy department were also lacking.
Given the availability of SWD equipment and its apparent efficacy in certain conditions, future research should aim to establish this by means of controlled clinical trials. The findings on safety practices underline the urgent need for comprehensive guidelines to ensure the safety of operators, patients and the general public during SWD application.
短波透热疗法(SWD)应用广泛,但目前尚无对其临床实践的全面研究。本文旨在评估连续(CSWD)和脉冲(PSWD)短波透热疗法应用中的临床及安全性问题,并指出未来研究方向。
对爱尔兰41家医院理疗科的116名资深物理治疗师进行了邮寄问卷调查。
研究的回复率为75%。分析发现,PSWD是首选的治疗方式,27%的受访者每天使用不止一次。受访者认为这两种治疗方式适用于多种病症。CSWD被评为治疗慢性骨关节炎、多关节炎、非特异性关节病和血肿的有效方法。PSWD被报告为治疗急性软组织损伤、血肿、急性骨关节炎、鼻窦炎和类风湿关节炎的有效方式。剂量选择差异很大,但往往基于病症的类型、性质和持续时间。对安全操作的分析发现了一些问题。虽然在患者安全措施方面达成了高度共识,但30%的受访者表示未采取任何操作人员安全措施,只有五名受访者表示他们与SWD设备保持规定距离。在理疗科确保其他人员安全的措施也很缺乏。
鉴于SWD设备的可用性及其在某些病症中的明显疗效,未来的研究应旨在通过对照临床试验来证实这一点。安全操作方面的研究结果突显了迫切需要全面的指南,以确保在SWD应用过程中操作人员、患者和公众的安全。