Intachote Thanyalak, Choowong Tidarat, In-Iw Supinya, Suwanwaree Jedsada, Manaboriboon Boonying
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Feb;97(2):184-90.
To determine the missed appointment rate and evaluate the factors related to appointment adherence in adolescent patients, based on the patients' characters and services provided.
All medical records in adolescent clinic at Siriraj Hospital between 2004 and 2009 were reviewed Patients that visited the clinic at least twice with the follow-up visit order were recruited. Data analyses were performed by Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test wherever appropriated.
One hundred twenty six patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients'mean age were 14.3-year-old (SD = 2.7) and the majority (95%) were students. Seventy one point five percent of principle diagnosis related to behavioral problems while 90% had at least one risky behavior detected Comparing between missed and non-missed appointment, only the acute illness and the history of appointment cancellation were significant different characters between groups (p < 0.001). Of 429 visits, 409 (95.3%) got telephone reminder a few days prior the appointment date, 48 (11.2%) remained non-complying and 40 (9.7%) had rescheduled. Only 18 (4.2%) of the visits were the patients themselves made re-appointments, which all complied with the new visit. Having rescheduled after being reminded and having history of a missed previous appointment were the most significant predictors for next appointment adherence (p = 0. 01 and p = 0.02 respectively).
In adolescents, appointment non-compliance is a challenging issue for clinicians. Predicting factors found in this study might help foster appointment adherence. Interestingly, services provided such as telephone reminder short waiting time, appointment time did not influence adherence in this population.
根据患者特征和所提供的服务,确定青少年患者的失约率,并评估与预约依从性相关的因素。
回顾了诗里拉吉医院青少年门诊2004年至2009年期间的所有病历。招募了至少就诊两次且有后续就诊预约的患者。在适当情况下,采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验进行数据分析。
126名患者符合纳入标准。患者的平均年龄为14.3岁(标准差=2.7),大多数(95%)是学生。71.5%的主要诊断与行为问题相关,而90%的患者至少检测到一种危险行为。比较失约和未失约的预约情况,两组之间只有急性疾病和预约取消史是显著不同的特征(p<0.001)。在429次就诊中,409次(95.3%)在预约日期前几天收到了电话提醒,48次(11.2%)仍未遵守预约,40次(9.7%)重新安排了预约。只有18次(4.2%)就诊是患者自己重新预约的,所有这些都遵守了新的预约。在收到提醒后重新安排预约以及有之前失约的历史是下一次预约依从性的最显著预测因素(分别为p=0.01和p=0.02)。
在青少年中,预约不依从对临床医生来说是一个具有挑战性的问题。本研究中发现的预测因素可能有助于提高预约依从性。有趣的是,诸如电话提醒、等待时间短、预约时间等所提供的服务在这一人群中并未影响依从性。