• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于起搏器相关感染的19年研究:主张使用术后抗生素。

A 19-year study on pacemaker-related infections: a claim for using postoperative antibiotics.

作者信息

Senaratne Janek M, Jayasuriya Anushka, Irwin Marleen, Gulamhusein Sajad, Senaratne Manohara P J

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Sciences, Grey Nuns Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;37(8):947-54. doi: 10.1111/pace.12403. Epub 2014 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1111/pace.12403
PMID:24766534
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of pacemaker-related infection (PMINF) is low, it necessitates removal of the pacing system. There is currently no consensus on antibiotics during implantation.

METHODS

A prospective database on patients undergoing pacemaker surgery from 1991 to 2009 was reviewed to determine factors associated with PMINF. Specifically, three eras of antibiotic use were compared to elucidate the effect of antibiotics on PMINF: no antibiotics, perioperative antibiotics, and peri- plus postoperative antibiotics.

RESULTS

There were 3,253 procedures with PMINF identified in 46 (1.4%) patients. Over 19 years, PMINF incidence fell from 3.6% (no antibiotics) to 2.9% (perioperative antibiotics), to 0.4% (peri- plus postoperative antibiotics). On univariate analysis, the following were associated with PMINF: nonuse of postoperative antibiotics (3.0% vs 0.4%, P < 0.001), year of implant (P < 0.001), repeat procedures (2.3% vs 1%, P = 0.006), nonuse of perioperative antibiotics (3.6% vs 1.3%, P = 0.027). With postoperative antibiotics, rates were significantly reduced in new implants (1/1,289 = 0.1% vs 22/967 = 2.3%, P < 0.001) and repeat procedures (7/692 = 1.0% vs 16/305 = 5.2%, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the following were significant (standardized coefficients denote relative importance): postoperative antibiotics (0.776), repeat procedures (0.508), year of implant (0.142), perioperative antibiotics (0.088).

CONCLUSIONS

The PMINF rate is reduced significantly by perioperative antibiotics with a further significant reduction with postoperative antibiotics. However, the reduction in PMINF rate could be a result of changes in practice in the different time eras. This study suggests consideration of perioperative followed by postoperative antibiotics to minimize pacemaker infections.

摘要

背景

尽管起搏器相关感染(PMINF)的发生率较低,但仍需要移除起搏系统。目前在植入过程中使用抗生素尚无共识。

方法

回顾了1991年至2009年接受起搏器手术患者的前瞻性数据库,以确定与PMINF相关的因素。具体而言,比较了三个抗生素使用时期,以阐明抗生素对PMINF的影响:不使用抗生素、围手术期使用抗生素以及围手术期加术后使用抗生素。

结果

在46例(1.4%)患者中识别出3253例伴有PMINF的手术。在19年期间,PMINF发生率从3.6%(不使用抗生素)降至2.9%(围手术期使用抗生素),再降至0.4%(围手术期加术后使用抗生素)。单因素分析显示,以下因素与PMINF相关:未使用术后抗生素(3.0%对0.4%,P<0.001)、植入年份(P<0.001)、重复手术(2.3%对1%,P = 0.006)、未使用围手术期抗生素(3.6%对1.3%,P = 0.027)。使用术后抗生素后,新植入手术的感染率显著降低(1/1289 = 0.1%对22/967 = 2.3%,P<0.001),重复手术的感染率也显著降低(7/692 = 1.0%对16/305 = 5.2%,P<0.001)。多因素分析显示,以下因素具有显著性(标准化系数表示相对重要性):术后抗生素(0.776)、重复手术(0.508)、植入年份(0.142)、围手术期抗生素(0.088)。

结论

围手术期使用抗生素可显著降低PMINF发生率,术后使用抗生素进一步显著降低该发生率。然而,PMINF发生率的降低可能是不同时期实践变化的结果。本研究建议考虑围手术期后使用术后抗生素,以尽量减少起搏器感染。

相似文献

1
A 19-year study on pacemaker-related infections: a claim for using postoperative antibiotics.一项关于起搏器相关感染的19年研究:主张使用术后抗生素。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;37(8):947-54. doi: 10.1111/pace.12403. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
2
Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis before the implantation of pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators: results of a large, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.起搏器和心脏复律除颤器植入前抗生素预防的疗效:一项大型、前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的结果
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009 Feb;2(1):29-34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.795906. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
3
Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1,628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration.乳房增大术、抗生素预防用药和感染:对 1628 例原发性隆乳术的对比分析,评估抗生素预防用药持续时间的作用和疗效。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010 Feb;34(1):42-7. doi: 10.1007/s00266-009-9427-8. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
4
Risk of infection after midurethral synthetic sling surgery: are postoperative antibiotics necessary?经尿道中段合成吊带手术后感染的风险:术后使用抗生素有必要吗?
Urology. 2010 Jun;75(6):1305-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.081. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
5
The role of prophylaxis topical antibiotics in cardiac device implantation.预防性局部抗生素在心脏器械植入中的作用。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Mar;37(3):304-11. doi: 10.1111/pace.12280. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
6
Efficacy of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in reducing permanent pacemaker infections.术后预防性使用抗生素对降低永久性起搏器感染的疗效。
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):559-565. doi: 10.1002/clc.22698. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
7
Short-term (48 hours) versus long-term (7 days) antibiotic prophylaxis for permanent pacemaker implantation.永久性起搏器植入短期(48小时)与长期(7天)抗生素预防
Indian Heart J. 2001 Nov-Dec;53(6):740-2.
8
Risk factor analysis of permanent pacemaker infection.永久性起搏器感染的危险因素分析
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jul 15;45(2):166-73. doi: 10.1086/518889. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
9
Transcutaneous lead implantation connected to an externalized pacemaker in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillator/pacemaker infection and pacemaker dependency.经皮导联植入术连接至体外起搏器在植入性心脏除颤器/起搏器感染和依赖起搏器的患者中的应用。
Europace. 2013 Aug;15(8):1205-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut031. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
10
[Antibiotic prophylaxis in the implantation of permanent pacemakers].
Minerva Med. 1982 Nov 17;73(44):3181-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the effectiveness of antimicrobial pouch use for infection prevention in sacral neuromodulation.评估抗菌袋在骶神经调节中预防感染的有效性。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Oct;34(10):2513-2517. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05570-w. Epub 2023 May 24.
2
Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis Following Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Placement.心脏植入式电子设备植入术后的抗生素预防
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2019 Aug 15;10(8):3777-3784. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2019.100804. eCollection 2019 Aug.
3
Risk factor analysis of device-related infections: value of re-sampling method on the real-world imbalanced dataset.
器械相关感染的危险因素分析:真实世界不平衡数据集重采样方法的价值。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Sep 11;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0899-4.
4
Sacral Neuromodulation Implant Infection: Risk Factors and Prevention.骶神经调节植入感染:危险因素与预防
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Feb;18(2):16. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0663-1.
5
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk.高危患者的心脏植入式电子设备感染
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016 May;5(1):65-71. doi: 10.15420/aer.2015.27.2.