Vianello Andrea, Arcaro Giovanna, Battistella Laura, Pipitone Emanuela, Vio Stefania, Concas Alessandra, Paladini Luciana, Gallan Federico, Marchi Maria Rita, Tona Francesco, Iliceto Sabino
Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, City Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, City Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
J Crit Care. 2014 Aug;29(4):562-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
Some patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) develop severe acute respiratory failure (ARF) requiring admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and ventilatory support. A limited number of observational studies have reported that noninvasive ventilation (NIV) can be an effective treatment to support breathing and to prevent use of invasive mechanical ventilation in these patients. This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the clinical status and outcomes in IPF patients receiving NIV for ARF and to identify those clinical and laboratory characteristics, which could be considered risk factors for its failure.
This is a retrospective analysis of short-term outcomes in 18 IPF patients being administered NIV for ARF. This study was conducted in a 4-bed respiratory ICU (RICU) in a university hospital. Eighteen IPF patients who were administered NIV between January 1, 2005, and April 30, 2013, were included. The outcome measures are the need for endotracheal intubation despite NIV treatment and mortality rate during their RICU stay. The length of the patients' stay in the RICU and their survival rate following RICU admission were also evaluated.
Noninvasive ventilation was successful in 8 patients and unsuccessful in 10 who required endotracheal intubation. All the patients in the NIV failure group died within 20.2±15.3 days of intubation. The patients in the NIV success group spent fewer days in the RICU (11.6±4.5 vs 24.6±13.7; P=.0146). The median survival time was significantly shorter for the patients in the NIV failure with respect to the success group (18.0 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 9.0-25.0] vs 90.0 [95% CI, 65.0-305.0] days; P<.0001); the survival rate at 90 days was, likewise, lower in the NIV failure group (0% vs 34%±19.5%). At admission, the patients in the failure group had significantly higher respiratory rate values (36.9±7.8 vs 30.5±3.3 breaths/min; P=.036), plasma N-terminal fragment of the prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (4528.8±4012.8 vs 634.6±808.0 pg/mL; P=.023) and serum C-reactive protein values (72.0±50.0 vs 20.7±24.0 μg/mL; P=.0289) with respect to those in the success group. Noninvasive ventilation failure was correlated to the plasma NT-proBNP levels at RICU admission (P=.0326) with an odds ratio of 12.2 (95% CI, 1.2 to infinity) in the patients with abnormally high values (>900 pg/mL).
The outcome of IPF patients who were administered NIV was quite poor. The use of NIV was, nevertheless, found to be associated with clinical benefits in selected IPF patients, preventing the need for intubation and reducing the rate of complications/death. Elevated plasma NT-proBNP levels at the time of ICU admission is a simple clinical marker for poor NIV outcome.
一些特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者会发展为严重急性呼吸衰竭(ARF),需要入住重症监护病房(ICU)并接受通气支持。少数观察性研究报告称,无创通气(NIV)可以作为一种有效的治疗方法,用于支持这些患者的呼吸并避免使用有创机械通气。本研究旨在回顾性调查接受NIV治疗ARF的IPF患者的临床状况和结局,并确定那些可被视为治疗失败危险因素的临床和实验室特征。
这是一项对18例接受NIV治疗ARF的IPF患者短期结局的回顾性分析。本研究在一家大学医院的4张床位的呼吸重症监护病房(RICU)中进行。纳入了2005年1月1日至2013年4月30日期间接受NIV治疗的18例IPF患者。结局指标为尽管接受了NIV治疗仍需要气管插管的情况以及在RICU住院期间的死亡率。还评估了患者在RICU的住院时间以及RICU入院后的生存率。
8例患者无创通气成功,10例失败,失败的患者需要气管插管。NIV失败组的所有患者在插管后20.2±15.3天内死亡。NIV成功组的患者在RICU的住院天数更少(11.6±4.5天对24.6±13.7天;P = 0.0146)。NIV失败组患者的中位生存时间相对于成功组显著缩短(18.0[95%置信区间{CI},9.0 - 25.0]天对90.0[95%CI,65.0 - 305.0]天;P < 0.0001);同样,NIV失败组90天时的生存率更低(0%对34%±19.5%)。入院时,失败组患者的呼吸频率值(36.9±7.8次/分钟对30.5±3.3次/分钟;P = 0.036)、血浆B型利钠肽原激素N末端片段(NT-proBNP)水平(4528.8±4012.8对634.6±808.0 pg/mL;P = 0.023)和血清C反应蛋白值(72.0±50.0对20.7±24.0 μg/mL;P = 0.0289)均显著高于成功组。无创通气失败与RICU入院时的血浆NT-proBNP水平相关(P = 0.0326),对于NT-proBNP值异常高(>900 pg/mL)的患者,比值比为12.2(95%CI,1.2至无穷大)。
接受NIV治疗的IPF患者结局相当差。然而,在部分IPF患者中,使用NIV被发现具有临床益处,可避免插管需求并降低并发症/死亡率。ICU入院时血浆NT-proBNP水平升高是NIV治疗结局不佳的一个简单临床指标。