Pinto Walkyria Araújo Macedo, Rossetti Heloisa Baccaro, Araújo Abigail, Spósito José Jonas, Salomão Hellen, Mattos Simone Siqueira, Rabelo Melina Vieira, Machado Flávia Ribeiro
Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014 Jan-Mar;26(1):7-12. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20140002.
To evaluate the role of quality indicators and adverse events registering in the quality assessment of intensive care physiotherapy and to evaluate the impact of implementing protocolized care and professional training in the quality improvement process.
A prospective before-after study was designed to assess 15 indicators of the quality of care. Baseline compliance and adverse events were collected before and after the implementation of treatment protocols and staff training.
Eighty-nine patients admitted, being 48 in the pre-intervention period and 41 in the post-intervention period with a total of 1246 and 1191 observations respectively. Among the indicators related to the global population, there was a significant improvement in chest x-ray control, multidisciplinary rounds and shift changes as well as in compliance with these decisions. Indicators related to the population under mechanical ventilation, obtained by direct observation at bedside, showed a significant improvement in the compliance with the tidal volume of 6-8mL/Kg, plateau pressure <30cmHO, adequate mechanical ventilation alarm setting, mechanical ventilation humidification control, adequate humidification line exchange and orotracheal tube position. Among the mechanical ventilation indicators collected through the physiotherapy records, there was significantly improved compliance with the predicted tidal volume registry and cuff pressure registry. There was a significant reduction in the number of adverse events. There was no impact on intensive care unit mortality, length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation and ventilator-free days.
It is possible to measure the quality of physiotherapy care using indicators of quality control. The implementation of care protocols and training of the professionals can improve team performance.
评估质量指标和不良事件记录在重症监护物理治疗质量评估中的作用,并评估实施规范化护理和专业培训在质量改进过程中的影响。
设计一项前瞻性前后对照研究,以评估15项护理质量指标。在实施治疗方案和员工培训前后收集基线依从性和不良事件。
共纳入89例患者,干预前期48例,干预后期41例,分别进行了1246次和1191次观察。在与总体人群相关的指标中,胸部X光检查、多学科查房和交接班以及这些决策的依从性有显著改善。通过床边直接观察获得的与机械通气人群相关的指标显示,在潮气量6-8mL/Kg、平台压<30cmH₂O、机械通气报警设置适当、机械通气加湿控制、加湿管路更换适当和气管插管位置方面的依从性有显著改善。在通过物理治疗记录收集的机械通气指标中,预测潮气量记录和套囊压力记录的依从性有显著改善。不良事件数量显著减少。对重症监护病房死亡率、住院时间、机械通气持续时间和无呼吸机天数没有影响。
使用质量控制指标可以衡量物理治疗护理的质量。实施护理方案和专业人员培训可以提高团队绩效。