Eggemann H, Ignatov T, Beni A, Costa S D, Ortmann O, Ignatov A
Unifrauenklinik, Magdeburg.
Lehrstuhl für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Uni Regensburg am Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Regensburg.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013 Oct;73(10):1028-1034. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350828.
The aim of this study was to investigate the value of intraoperative ultrasound in breast-conserving operations and to compare it with standard procedures. For this purpose 307 women with palpable breast cancers and 116 patients with non-palpable breast cancers were compared retrospectively. In the group with palpable breast cancers 177 patients were treated by US-guided operations and 130 patients underwent palpation-guided breast-conserving operations. As primary outcomes, the resection margins and the rate of re-operations were evaluated. With regard to disease-free resection margins, intraoperative ultrasound was significantly superior to palpation alone. In the group of patients in whom the tumours were extirpated with the help of palpation, R1 resections were observed almost twice as often (16.9 %) as in the US-guided group (8.5 %). In the group with non-palpable breast cancers, intraoperative ultrasound was employed in 61 patients. As a control, 43 cases were evaluated in whom the breast-conserving operation was performed after wire marking. In this group US-guided tumour removal proved to be superior to that after wire marking for tumours that did not exhibit any intraductal components. Otherwise the redo resection rate was reduced by use of ultrasound. Furthermore, the surgeon was able by means of intraoperative ultrasound to identify "problematic" margins and to excise them in the same sitting. The US-guided, breast-conserving operations led to a lower rate of R1 resections and redo operations in comparison to operations with palpation alone or those after wire marking.
本研究的目的是探讨术中超声在保乳手术中的价值,并将其与标准手术方法进行比较。为此,对307例可触及乳腺癌患者和116例不可触及乳腺癌患者进行了回顾性比较。在可触及乳腺癌组中,177例患者接受了超声引导下手术,130例患者接受了触诊引导下保乳手术。作为主要观察指标,评估了切除边缘和再次手术率。关于无病切除边缘,术中超声明显优于单纯触诊。在触诊辅助切除肿瘤的患者组中,R1切除的发生率几乎是超声引导组(8.5%)的两倍(16.9%)。在不可触及乳腺癌组中,61例患者采用了术中超声。作为对照,对43例在金属丝标记后进行保乳手术的病例进行了评估。在该组中,对于没有任何导管内成分的肿瘤,超声引导下肿瘤切除被证明优于金属丝标记后的切除。否则,使用超声可降低再次切除率。此外,外科医生能够通过术中超声识别“有问题的”边缘并在同一次手术中切除它们。与单纯触诊手术或金属丝标记后手术相比,超声引导下保乳手术导致R1切除率和再次手术率更低。