Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3198-203. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1958-y. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
We sought to determine the re-excision rate following lumpectomy for palpable breast cancers using intraoperative ultrasound (US). A secondary aim was to investigate the impact on surgical decision-making.
We identified 73 women who underwent US-guided lumpectomy for palpable breast cancer between 2006 and 2010. A cohort of 124 women who underwent palpation-guided lumpectomy was used for a comparison group. Data included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, intraoperative findings, and pathologic outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used for data summary and compared by chi-square or t test, as appropriate.
A total of 73 women underwent US-guided lumpectomy, and 124 women underwent palpation-guided lumpectomy (median age 55 years). Patients undergoing palpation-guided lumpectomy had smaller tumors that were more likely to be HER2/neu amplified compared with patients undergoing US-guided lumpectomy (P < 0.05 for each). There were no differences between the 2 groups with respect to patient age, tumor grade, and estrogen/progesterone receptor status (P > 0.05 for each). Re-excision rates were similar in both groups [17 (23%) in the US group versus 31 (25%) in the palpation group; P > 0.05]. In the US group, 45 patients (62%) had additional shave margins taken based on US interrogation of the specimen, and 12 patients (16%) were spared a 2nd procedure based on the use of intraoperative US.
Although palpable breast cancers can be excised based on direct palpation or needle localization, we believe that US guidance provides an excellent tool to aid the breast surgeon. Only 10% of patients had a positive margin on final pathology as a result, and the overall re-excision rate was acceptable.
我们旨在通过术中超声(US)确定经皮切除术治疗可触及乳腺癌的再次切除率。次要目的是研究其对手术决策的影响。
我们确定了 73 名 2006 年至 2010 年间接受 US 引导下经皮切除术治疗可触及乳腺癌的患者。还选择了 124 名接受触诊引导下经皮切除术的患者作为比较组。数据包括患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征、术中发现和病理结果。采用描述性统计数据进行数据汇总,并根据需要通过卡方检验或 t 检验进行比较。
共有 73 名患者接受 US 引导下经皮切除术,124 名患者接受触诊引导下经皮切除术(中位年龄 55 岁)。与接受 US 引导下经皮切除术的患者相比,接受触诊引导下经皮切除术的患者肿瘤更小,且更可能为 HER2/neu 扩增(P < 0.05)。两组患者的年龄、肿瘤分级和雌激素/孕激素受体状态无差异(P > 0.05)。两组的再次切除率相似[US 组 17 例(23%),触诊组 31 例(25%);P > 0.05]。在 US 组中,根据对标本的 US 检查,45 名患者(62%)追加了额外的切缘,根据术中 US 的使用,12 名患者(16%)避免了第二次手术。
尽管可触及的乳腺癌可以根据直接触诊或针定位切除,但我们认为 US 引导提供了一个很好的工具来辅助乳腺外科医生。最终病理学上仅有 10%的患者有阳性边缘,总体再次切除率是可以接受的。