• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短期治疗中来访者与治疗师的真实关系及治疗质量:一项行为者-伙伴相互依赖分析

Clients' and therapists' real relationship and session quality in brief therapy: an actor partner interdependence analysis.

作者信息

Markin Rayna D, Kivlighan Dennis M, Gelso Charles J, Hummel Ann M, Spiegel Eric B

机构信息

Department of Education and Counseling.

Department of Counseling, Higher Education and Special Education, University of Maryland.

出版信息

Psychotherapy (Chic). 2014 Sep;51(3):413-23. doi: 10.1037/a0036069. Epub 2014 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1037/a0036069
PMID:24773091
Abstract

This study used the Actor Partner Interdependence Model (APIM; Kenny & Cook, 1999) to examine the associations of client- and therapist-rated real relationship (RR) and session quality over time. Eighty-seven clients and their therapists (n = 25) completed RR and session quality measures after every session of brief therapy. Therapists' current session quality ratings were significantly related to all of the following: session number (b = .04), their session quality rating of the previous session (b = .24), their RR in the previous session (b = 1.091), their client's RR in the previous session (b = .17), and interactions between their own and their clients' RR and session number (b = -.16 and β = -.04, respectively). Clients' ratings of current session quality were significantly related to only their own RR in the previous session (b = .47). Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

摘要

本研究采用演员-搭档相互依赖模型(APIM;肯尼和库克,1999)来检验随着时间推移,客户和治疗师评定的真实关系(RR)与治疗 session 质量之间的关联。87 名客户及其 25 名治疗师在每次简短治疗 session 后完成了 RR 和治疗 session 质量测量。治疗师当前对治疗 session 质量的评定与以下所有因素显著相关:治疗 session 次数(b = 0.04)、他们对上一个治疗 session 的质量评定(b = 0.24)、他们在上一个治疗 session 中的 RR(b = 1.091)、他们客户在上一个治疗 session 中的 RR(b = 0.17),以及他们自己和客户的 RR 与治疗 session 次数之间的交互作用(分别为 b = -0.16 和β = -0.04)。客户对当前治疗 session 质量的评定仅与他们自己在上一个治疗 session 中的 RR 显著相关(b = 0.47)。文中讨论了对未来研究和实践的启示。

相似文献

1
Clients' and therapists' real relationship and session quality in brief therapy: an actor partner interdependence analysis.短期治疗中来访者与治疗师的真实关系及治疗质量:一项行为者-伙伴相互依赖分析
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2014 Sep;51(3):413-23. doi: 10.1037/a0036069. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
2
Working alliance, real relationship, session quality, and client improvement in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A longitudinal actor partner interdependence model.心理动力心理治疗中的工作联盟、真实关系、治疗过程质量与来访者改善:一种纵向行为者-伙伴相互依存模型
J Couns Psychol. 2016 Mar;63(2):149-61. doi: 10.1037/cou0000134. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
3
Clients' and therapists' views of the therapeutic alliance: similarities, differences and relationship to therapy outcome.患者和治疗师对治疗联盟的看法:相似性、差异性及其与治疗效果的关系。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):118-35. doi: 10.1002/cpp.792. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
4
Retraction of Kivlighan et al. (2016).撤回基夫利根等人(2016 年)的文章。
J Couns Psychol. 2023 Oct;70(5):463. doi: 10.1037/cou0000697.
5
The unfolding of the real relationship and the outcome of brief psychotherapy.真实关系的展开和短程心理治疗的结果。
J Couns Psychol. 2012 Oct;59(4):495-506. doi: 10.1037/a0029838. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
6
Therapists' projection: the effects of therapists' relationship themes on their formulation of clients' relationship episodes.治疗师的投射:治疗师关系主题对其客户关系片段构建的影响。
Psychother Res. 2009 May;19(3):312-22. doi: 10.1080/10503300902838130.
7
Therapists' and clients' ratings of real relationship, attachment, therapist self-disclosure, and treatment progress.治疗师和来访者对真实关系、依恋、治疗师自我表露和治疗进展的评估。
Psychother Res. 2019 Jul;29(5):594-606. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1425929. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
8
Client and therapist therapeutic alliance, session evaluation, and client reliable change: a moderated actor-partner interdependence model.患者与治疗师的治疗联盟、会谈评估以及患者的可靠变化:一个有调节的演员-伙伴相互依赖模型。
J Couns Psychol. 2014 Jan;61(1):15-23. doi: 10.1037/a0034939. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
9
"Where is the relationship" revisited: Using actor-partner interdependence modeling and common fate model in examining dyadic working alliance and session quality.“关系在哪里”再探:使用演员-伙伴相互依存模型和共同命运模型检验对偶工作联盟和会议质量。
J Couns Psychol. 2021 Mar;68(2):194-207. doi: 10.1037/cou0000515. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
10
The insecure psychotherapy base: Using client and therapist attachment styles to understand the early alliance.不安全的心理治疗基础:利用来访者与治疗师的依恋风格理解早期联盟。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2014 Sep;51(3):404-412. doi: 10.1037/a0031989. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
When therapist estimations of the process of treatment can predict patients rating on outcome: The case of the working alliance.当治疗师对治疗过程的评估能够预测患者对治疗结果的评价时:以工作联盟为例。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Apr;86(4):398-402. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000293.
2
The relationship between alliance and outcome: Analysis of a two-person perspective on alliance and session outcome.联盟与治疗结果之间的关系:从两人视角分析联盟与单次治疗结果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Jun;84(6):484-96. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000058. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
3
Convergence in patient-therapist therapeutic alliance ratings and its relation to outcome in chronic depression treatment.
患者与治疗师在治疗联盟评分上的一致性及其与慢性抑郁症治疗结果的关系。
Psychother Res. 2017 Jul;27(4):410-424. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1114687. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
4
Dynamic relationships of therapist alliance and group cohesion in transdiagnostic group CBT for anxiety disorders.焦虑症跨诊断团体认知行为疗法中治疗师联盟与团体凝聚力的动态关系
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Feb;84(2):146-55. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000062. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
5
Therapist-reported alliance: Is it really a predictor of outcome?治疗师报告的联盟:它真的是治疗结果的预测指标吗?
J Couns Psychol. 2015 Oct;62(4):568-78. doi: 10.1037/cou0000106. Epub 2015 Aug 31.