Mishra Mayank, Chaudhri Sudhir, Tripathi Vidisha, Verma Ajay K, Sampath Arun, Chauhan Nishant K
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Department of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Lung India. 2014 Apr;31(2):127-33. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.129827.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients frequently pose difficulty in weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). Prolonged invasive ventilation brings along various complications. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is proposed to be a useful weaning modality in such cases.
To evaluate the usefulness of NIPPV in weaning COPD patients from invasive MV, and compare it with weaning by conventional pressure support ventilation (PSV).
For this prospective randomized controlled study, we included 50 COPD patients with type II respiratory failure requiring initial invasive MV. Upon satisfying weaning criteria and failing a t-piece weaning trial, they were randomized into two groups: Group I (25 patients) weaned by NIPPV, and group II (25 patients) weaned by conventional PSV. The groups were similar in terms of disease severity, demographic, clinical and biochemical parameters. They were compared in terms of duration of MV, weaning duration, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, occurrence of nosocomial pneumonia and outcome.
Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of duration of MV, weaning duration, length of ICU stay, occurrence of nosocomial pneumonia and outcome.
NIPPV appears to be a promising weaning modality for mechanically ventilated COPD patients and should be tried in resource-limited settings especially in developing countries.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者常难以从有创机械通气(MV)中撤机。长时间的有创通气会带来各种并发症。在这种情况下,无创正压通气(NIPPV)被认为是一种有用的撤机方式。
评估NIPPV在COPD患者有创MV撤机中的有效性,并与传统压力支持通气(PSV)撤机进行比较。
在这项前瞻性随机对照研究中,我们纳入了50例需要初始有创MV的II型呼吸衰竭COPD患者。在满足撤机标准且T管撤机试验失败后,他们被随机分为两组:I组(25例患者)采用NIPPV撤机,II组(25例患者)采用传统PSV撤机。两组在疾病严重程度、人口统计学、临床和生化参数方面相似。比较两组的MV持续时间、撤机持续时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、医院获得性肺炎的发生率和结局。
两组在MV持续时间、撤机持续时间、ICU住院时间、医院获得性肺炎的发生率和结局方面存在统计学显著差异。
NIPPV似乎是机械通气COPD患者一种有前景的撤机方式,尤其在资源有限的环境中,特别是在发展中国家,应尝试使用。