Moon Karam, Albuquerque Felipe C, Mitkov Mario, Ducruet Andrew F, Wilson David A, Crowley R Webster, Nakaji Peter, McDougall Cameron G
Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 May;7(5):346-50. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011161. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
Clinical outcomes of methamphetamine users with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are unknown.
To analyze differences in presentation, in-hospital morbidity, and outcomes between methamphetamine users and non-users.
All 472 patients included in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial from 2003 to 2007 were reviewed. Patients with 1- and 3-year follow-up were included in this analysis (n=398). Methamphetamine users were identified as patients who provided a history of methamphetamine use on admission or tested positive on urine toxicology testing. Methamphetamine users were compared with non-users using univariate analysis. Outcomes were then analyzed using multivariate logistic regression models for demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, radiographic and clinical presentation, and vasospasm.
Thirty-one patients (7.8%) were identified as methamphetamine users in this cohort. Methamphetamine users were younger than non-users (mean age 42.8 vs 55 years, p<0.001). In multivariate logistic regression models, methamphetamine use was an independent predictor of poor Glasgow Outcome Scale score at both 1 year (OR=5.02; 95% CI 1.03 to 24.48; p<0.05) and 3 years (OR=7.18; 95% CI 1.73 to 29.87; p=0.007). Other independent predictors in this model included older age, clinical vasospasm, diabetes, and aneurysm size. Cocaine and tobacco use were not significantly associated with poor outcome in our cohort. Methamphetamine use was not significantly associated with vasospasm, higher Fisher or Hunt and Hess grade, or intraparenchymal hemorrhage/intraventricular hemorrhage.
Methamphetamine users have significantly worse outcomes at 1 and 3 years following aSAH. Further analysis is necessary to understand the pathological response associated with methamphetamine use in this setting.
患有动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)的甲基苯丙胺使用者的临床结局尚不清楚。
分析甲基苯丙胺使用者与非使用者在临床表现、住院发病率及结局方面的差异。
对2003年至2007年纳入巴罗破裂动脉瘤试验的所有472例患者进行回顾。本分析纳入了有1年和3年随访的患者(n = 398)。甲基苯丙胺使用者被确定为入院时提供甲基苯丙胺使用史或尿液毒理学检测呈阳性的患者。使用单因素分析将甲基苯丙胺使用者与非使用者进行比较。然后使用多因素逻辑回归模型分析结局,该模型考虑人口统计学特征、合并症、影像学和临床表现以及血管痉挛情况。
该队列中有31例患者(7.8%)被确定为甲基苯丙胺使用者。甲基苯丙胺使用者比非使用者年轻(平均年龄42.8岁对55岁,p < 0.001)。在多因素逻辑回归模型中,甲基苯丙胺使用是1年时(比值比[OR]=5.02;95%置信区间[CI] 1.03至24.48;p < 0.05)和3年时(OR = 7.18;95% CI 1.73至29.87;p = 0.007)格拉斯哥预后评分差的独立预测因素。该模型中的其他独立预测因素包括年龄较大、临床血管痉挛、糖尿病和动脉瘤大小。在我们的队列中,使用可卡因和烟草与不良结局无显著关联。甲基苯丙胺使用与血管痉挛、较高的Fisher或Hunt和Hess分级或脑实质内出血/脑室内出血无显著关联。
aSAH后1年和3年,甲基苯丙胺使用者的结局明显更差。有必要进行进一步分析以了解在此情况下与甲基苯丙胺使用相关的病理反应。