Standerholen Fride Berg, Myromslien Frøydis Deinboll, Kommisrud Elisabeth, Ropstad Erik, Waterhouse Karin Elisabeth
Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian School of Veterinary Sciences, Oslo, Norway; Department of Natural Sciences and Technology, Hedmark University College, Hamar, Norway.
Cytometry A. 2014 Aug;85(8):719-28. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22474. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
The objective of the study was to compare two different flow cytometers to reveal if there are differences between them and to find the most suitable protocol for analysis of spermatozoa. These two flow cytometers; Cell Lab Quanta™ and Coulter Epics XL, have different principles to calculate cell size, electric volume, and forward scatter (FS), respectively. Flow cytometry is a valuable tool to assess various spermatozoa quality traits simultaneously, such as plasma membrane and acrosome integrity. A double- and triple-stain combination was performed to compare evaluation of these two parameters by both flow cytometers and to assess the need of a fluorescent probe to identify the spermatozoa. Propidium iodide was used to assess the proportion of dead spermatozoa, whereas Alexa Fluor(®) 488 conjugated peanut agglutinin (PNA- Alexa 488) was used to evaluate the percentage of acrosome intact and acrosome-reacted cells or degenerated cells. In the triple-stain protocol, MitoTracker(®) Orange (MO) was included to test the capacity of this probe to discriminate spermatozoa from egg yolk and debris particles present in the semen sample. Cryopreserved semen from 13 Norwegian Red bulls was included in the study and the semen was evaluated immediately after thawing and after 3 hr incubation at 37°C. The results show that there is good agreement between the instruments. Nevertheless, a significant difference was found in percentages of acrosome intact live spermatozoa (% AIL) when including MO as a spermatozoa identification probe, compared to assessment without MO, with the Coulter Epics XL, while no significant difference was found when including the probe with the Cell Lab Quanta. In conclusion, the results show that cell size measurement based on electronic volume used by the Cell Lab Quanta flow cytometer is more accurate than FS used by the Coulter Epics XL flow cytometer in identification of spermatozoa.
本研究的目的是比较两种不同的流式细胞仪,以揭示它们之间是否存在差异,并找到分析精子的最合适方案。这两种流式细胞仪,即Cell Lab Quanta™和库尔特Epics XL,分别采用不同的原理来计算细胞大小、电体积和前向散射(FS)。流式细胞术是一种同时评估各种精子质量特征(如质膜和顶体完整性)的有价值工具。进行了双重和三重染色组合,以比较两种流式细胞仪对这两个参数的评估,并评估识别精子所需的荧光探针。碘化丙啶用于评估死精子的比例,而Alexa Fluor(®) 488缀合的花生凝集素(PNA-Alexa 488)用于评估顶体完整、顶体反应细胞或退化细胞的百分比。在三重染色方案中,加入了MitoTracker(®) Orange(MO),以测试该探针区分精子与精液样本中存在的蛋黄和碎片颗粒的能力。本研究纳入了13头挪威红牛的冷冻精液,并在解冻后和37°C孵育3小时后立即对精液进行评估。结果表明,两种仪器之间具有良好的一致性。然而,与不使用MO评估时相比,在库尔特Epics XL仪器中,将MO作为精子识别探针时,顶体完整活精子的百分比(%AIL)存在显著差异,而在Cell Lab Quanta仪器中使用该探针时未发现显著差异。总之,结果表明,在识别精子方面,Cell Lab Quanta流式细胞仪基于电体积的细胞大小测量比库尔特Epics XL流式细胞仪使用的FS更准确。