Ojeda-May Pedro, Pu Jingzhi
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 402 N. Blackford Street, LD326, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.
J Chem Phys. 2014 Apr 28;140(16):164106. doi: 10.1063/1.4871871.
We tested the isotropic periodic sum (IPS) method for computing Madelung energies of ionic crystals. The performance of the method, both in its nonpolar (IPSn) and polar (IPSp) forms, was compared with that of the zero-charge and Wolf potentials [D. Wolf, P. Keblinski, S. R. Phillpot, and J. Eggebrecht, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 8254 (1999)]. The results show that the IPSn and IPSp methods converge the Madelung energy to its reference value with an average deviation of ∼10(-4) and ∼10(-7) energy units, respectively, for a cutoff range of 18-24a (a/2 being the nearest-neighbor ion separation). However, minor oscillations were detected for the IPS methods when deviations of the computed Madelung energies were plotted on a logarithmic scale as a function of the cutoff distance. To remove such oscillations, we introduced a modified IPSn potential in which both the local-region and long-range electrostatic terms are damped, in analogy to the Wolf potential. With the damped-IPSn potential, a smoother convergence was achieved. In addition, we observed a better agreement between the damped-IPSn and IPSp methods, which suggests that damping the IPSn potential is in effect similar to adding a screening potential in IPSp.
我们测试了用于计算离子晶体马德隆能的各向同性周期求和(IPS)方法。将该方法的非极性(IPSn)和极性(IPSp)形式的性能与零电荷和沃尔夫势的性能进行了比较[D. 沃尔夫、P. 凯布利斯基、S. R. 菲尔波特和J. 埃格布雷希特,《化学物理杂志》110, 8254 (1999)]。结果表明,对于18 - 24a的截止范围(a/2为最近邻离子间距),IPSn和IPSp方法分别将马德隆能收敛到其参考值时,平均偏差分别约为10^(-4)和10^(-7)能量单位。然而,当将计算得到的马德隆能偏差作为截止距离的函数绘制在对数尺度上时,检测到IPS方法存在微小振荡。为消除此类振荡,我们引入了一种修正的IPSn势,其中局部区域和长程静电项都像沃尔夫势那样进行了阻尼。使用阻尼后的IPSn势,实现了更平滑的收敛。此外,我们观察到阻尼后的IPSn和IPSp方法之间有更好的一致性,这表明对IPSn势进行阻尼实际上类似于在IPSp中添加一个屏蔽势。